My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
02-09-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2026 11:22:22 AM
Creation date
2/17/2026 11:17:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. Bylaws and rules of order <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd.2. <br />A statutory city council has the power to regulate its own meeting procedures. <br />Home rule charter cities may have similar provisions in their charters. Councils <br />often regulate their procedures through bylaws and rules of order. Rules of <br />See Appendix A: Minnesota <br />order are also commonly referred to as parliamentary rules of procedure, <br />Mayors Association City <br />Council Bylaws. <br />parliamentary procedure, rules of procedure or procedural rules. Councils are <br />not required to adopt bylaws or rules of order for meeting management, but <br />they are highly recommended for the following reasons: <br />• They set common values and expectations for interactions among council <br />members. <br />• They can provide structure to a meeting, promoting timeliness and <br />efficiency. <br />• They can help resolve conflicts in a positive way that promotes the best <br />interests of the city, rather than allowing conflicts to grow, potentially <br />disrupting city operations and slowing vital council decisions. <br />Within or separate from bylaws, city councils often have meeting rules of <br />order. Many cities have formally adopted or informally observe some version <br />of Robert's Rules of Order as rules of order. There are, however, disadvantages <br />to adopting Robert's Rules to govern procedure at council meetings. Some of <br />the disadvantages of using Robert's Rules are: <br />• They were not crafted with Minnesota law in mind and sometimes diverge <br />from legal requirements for Minnesota cities. <br />• They were crafted to govern large bodies of assembly (such as a <br />parliament) and are sometimes unwieldy for smaller bodies. <br />• While shorter condensed versions of Robert's Rules exist, typical volumes <br />of the rules are 200 pages or longer. This can be difficult for new members <br />to learn. Council members who are unfamiliar with the intricacies of <br />Robert's Rules may feel silenced by their unfamiliarity with technical points <br />or outmaneuvered by council members who are more familiar with the <br />rules. <br />See Appendix D: Minnesota <br />For these reasons, city councils may prefer to adopt more simplified rules of <br />Mayors Association Sample <br />Rules of order for city <br />order. Several other models exist, or the council can draft its own policy to fit <br />Councils. <br />the organization and desired level of formality. Sample simplified rules of <br />order (complete with a 2-page cheat sheet!) are in the appendices of this <br />handbook. <br />It's very important to adopt written rules of order before there is a problem <br />that rules of order could solve. If a meeting becomes contentious for whatever <br />reason, it may be impossible to get back on track if there isn't already <br />agreement on how the meeting should proceed. <br />Minnesota <br />Mayors <br />Association <br />Chapter 1-17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.