Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . <br /> intersection, which Kcithson Drive residcnts find ohjcctionable, apart from any e <br /> interference with other eastbound traffic that may rcsult. Again, a County permit will be <br /> req u ired, <br /> 4) With several acres now in grass or bush to be covered by impervious buildings <br /> and parking or driveway surfaces, where will the iucreased runoff go? The extremely <br /> limited amount of green space except in two spots could be increascd if the number of <br /> units wcre to be decreased to, say, 24 rather than 30. <br /> 5) Thc whole project is immediately adjacent to a residential area, especially the <br /> two 5-unit buildings along the south border. Thc setback there appears to be 20 feet, <br /> whcreas NB zoning requires "Buffer yards 30 fect in width [to] be provided adjacent to <br /> all residential uses outside the neighborhood business district," with specific landscape <br /> provisions that are not to be included into the minimum landscaping calculation for the <br /> projcct as a whole, Moreover, the 3-unit building along the wcst border sque~zes the <br /> asphalt trail between its rear wall and the rear lines of the Keith son Drive lots, and would <br /> require the removal of the few large trees that remaiu on the property from its former use, <br /> 6) Where parking lot lighting on the Lakeville project is on poles that appear to be <br /> 25 feet high, Arden Hills NB zoning requircs pcdestals not to exceed 14 fect high. This is <br /> especially important adjacent to residences on thc west and south sides. <br /> 7) Where the required 30-foot setback might allow the retcntion of some existing - <br /> large trees along the south border, the initial proposal would apparently require the <br /> removal of all natural vegetation, even if partially replaced later by nursery stock. Loss of <br /> all trees along the south border would leave a woodcd background appearance from <br /> Highway 96, but it would result entirely from trees on AHNl-IA common land. <br /> R)()ur e~.titn~t(': of nlP. 8ff':8 nf !hP p..,f~',""r''''':' ~; "'''1 4;fTh.y,,~, o~ . <br /> heIght above ground of 15 ft., whereas the sign ordmance allows only 60 sq, ft. in the NB <br /> district. Similarly, the unit signs shown on the front elevation are 20 sq. ft. versus 6 sq, ft. <br /> allowed on individual units in the NB zone. Signs of about this size on units in the <br /> Lakeville projcct look OK. <br /> 9) The pond in the NE comer behind the dayeare center appears to be at least <br /> several feet deep, with 2 and 3-story building hcights showing along its south side, as <br /> well as along the west side of the adjacent building, duc to walkouts, The initial plan <br /> shows walkouts on both the 6- and the 5-unit buildings thcre, although it was claimed at <br /> thc neighborhood meeting that there would be less. How will the pond be fenced or <br /> otherwisc protected? <br /> 10) \Ve requcst assurancc in writing that I) only one office would bc permitted <br /> per unit (whercas the walkouts might permit two via lease, even if each unit had one e <br /> owner), and 2) that no subsequent amendment to providc for any residential use would be <br /> requcsted or honored. <br />