Laserfiche WebLink
Parks, Trails & Recreation Committee – January 20, 2026 Page 9 <br /> <br />specifically to pickup trash. Is there list of tasks that they don’t do, that would then fall to the <br />participants of this program? <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said there is a plan for each park and part of that plan <br />sometimes is minimum maintenance. All of Arden Hills park spaces have a maintenance plan. <br />They may be doing some of the things, including making time for minimum maintenance. If a <br />group wanted to come in and do something new, upon approval, that group would have to maintain <br />whatever task they presented. If that same group decides to discontinue maintenance, the City will <br />not be responsible for maintaining that. Typically, a group that adopts a park would take over some <br />of that minimum maintenance and possibly enhance it by doing a little bit more. <br /> <br />Chair Julius said she likes the draft document definitions. She suggested segmenting the content <br />into categories to make everything more readable. She thought outlining a “commitment level” <br />with options from low, medium to high commitment. Separating it by commitment level may be <br />helpful when applicants are deciding what they want to commit to. It might also be helpful to list <br />the parks and the key responsibilities needed at each park. Maybe there’s a map of parks and the <br />adopters can be shown on the map. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said this program is not intended to create any <br />additional work for Parks and Recreation Staff. It is not intended to remove anything from the <br />Public Works Maintenance Plan. It is not intended for PTRC to take charge, either. It’s meant to <br />engage individuals, groups or businesses who want to do something above and beyond what is <br />currently in place. <br /> <br />Committee Member Johnson said when she worked on rain gardens, the City gave people <br />opportunity to do amazing things with the rain gardens. The ownership was on the homeowner. If <br />they decided to stop maintaining it, that rain garden received no further attention. She said the <br />work being done at Floral Park is amazing. The park looks gorgeous. If those volunteers stop doing <br />that, it would be horrific. Residents are used to going through that park and seeing that beauty. We <br />have to have contingency plans. How do we do that? If that group stopped the work in Floral Park <br />tomorrow, what do we do? <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said due to staffing levels at the City, we would not be <br />taking on those additional projects. <br /> <br />Committee Member Johnson said the next step would be recruitment. Hopefully the groups will <br />want to sign up for 5 years. Her other comment is she believes Boston Scientific paid for the picnic <br />shelter at Cummings Park. She said adding an option for larger entities to donate money towards <br />larger features like that may be helpful. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said the City is aiming to raise a lot of sponsorships <br />for the 75th Anniversary. Monetary donations for parks assets would probably fall under the <br />sponsorship program. She summarized that she heard PTRC say add a list of parks and identify <br />different commitment levels. <br /> <br />Committee Member Johnson thought we could request an exit plan. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said that is a good idea for the groups that are doing <br />big projects.