My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-25 SPC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2025
>
12-10-25 SPC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2026 8:25:28 AM
Creation date
3/11/2026 8:25:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION – December 10, 2025 3 <br /> <br />2. No additional exterior signage related to the cannabis wholesale use shall be permitted. <br />3. The Applicant shall comply with all sections of the City Code and with applicable State <br />Statutes. <br />4. An odor management plan must be submitted to the City prior to issuance of the <br />Conditional Use Permit. <br />5. The Applicant shall for the duration of the Conditional Use Permit continue to provide <br />evidence to the City of the status of each operator’s state licensure annually and no later <br />than the first business day of December of each year. <br />6. Not more than 10% of the building’s floor area may be used for office use. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly reviewed the options available to the Planning <br />Commission for a decision on this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Collins opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Chair Collins asked to clarify that the only reason the Planning Commission was reviewing this <br />case was because this was a cannabis use. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lindau asked what kind of internal security measures would be put in place for <br />the individual units. <br /> <br />Brandon Champeau, applicant, explained items would be stored within individual, secure units. <br />He reported the 52,000-foot vacant space would have to comply with any State Statute with <br />respect to internal security. He noted the building had security and alarms as well. <br /> <br />Chair Collins opened the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Collins invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />There being no comment from the public, Chair Collins closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burlingame stated after reviewing the operational safeguards and the clear <br />alignment with the Gateway Business District he would be offering his support for this project. <br />He recommended one condition be considered to require an odor plan to be in place prior to <br />occupancy. <br /> <br />Chair Collins reported Condition 4 states: An odor management plan must be submitted to the <br />City prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burlingame indicated he would like this condition to be amended to read: An <br />odor management plan shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff prior to the <br />occupancy of each cannabis wholesale tenant. Odor control measures must be tailored to each <br />tenant specific products and packaging to ensure there is no detectable odor at the property line.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.