Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – FEBRUARY 9, 2026 16 <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed. It’s all negotiable. If we want this to go to <br />the Planning Commission in March, he would want to send it there with at least a 7.5% minimum <br />number of units for low income and workforce housing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked how increasing the lower income at 50% to 7.5% impacts it? <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly said there is an argument that the region needs more <br />units at 50% or less so there is a higher need for that. Meaning we want that to be at the same level <br />as the others. Developers target market rate. The market rate is that 80-100% of the AMI. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said we want to make sure people aren’t walking away from developing <br />here. She said this is more aggressive than Shoreview. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber is willing to adjust the numbers in section 8.1. He recognizes that aiming <br />for 60% to get a density bonus is ideal, he doesn’t think it’s realistic. He thinks 80% is better. We <br />haven’t seen one of these developments get fully vetted and reviewed with analyzing their finances <br />to determine how well they are coming out. Keeping densities at a moderate number allows the city <br />to get the benefits we want, through negotiation. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant doesn’t want us to price ourselves out of the market by going over the top with <br />affordability. We need to be middle of the road. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly said these percentages are options. It’s not all in one. <br />They can pick more than one. He’s hearing we don’t want to incentivize anyone to produce income <br />units targeted to people who are below 50% of AMI. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant thinks we’re starting to price ourselves out of the market when we’re forcing that <br />into the equation. There are other communities that went in big-time and developers just don’t try <br />in those communities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber asked for confirmation that if a developer comes in and offers <br />affordability with 5% of their units being 50% AMI, they qualify. They wouldn’t also need to 7.5% <br />and 10%. If they come in with 10% of their units being 80% AMI, they qualify and don’t need to <br />do the other two. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly confirmed <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said he’s still at 15%, 5% and 0%. <br /> <br />Councilmember Weber said if we put 0 in there that means they can do 0 at 50% AMI and still <br />qualify. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant is saying you would take that whole line item out. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be willing to send this to the Planning Commission. She asked <br />if it would be valuable for them to also have the neighboring communities’ markets, for them to <br />consider.