03-09-26-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – FEBRUARY 9, 2026 4 explained this was a very large project and staff had to evaluate if the hybrid approach would balance the risk of moving the project forward. Councilmember Holden reported a master developer was proposed to ensure Ramsey County did not have to assume all the risk. She supported someone completing research because now the Army was being blamed for delaying this project. She indicated the Army has always been clear about needing a five-year timeline for planning and budgeting purposes. She was concerned that there were communication failures when it came to working with the Army. Mayor Grant concurred this was previously known. Councilmember Monson stated a Councilmember may have asked staff for information regarding what the County was doing with the Army. She indicated she was a developer and she understood how the federal government operated. She reported this project was targeted for sustainability and noted the Army has been a point of frustration for herself. Councilmember Weber noted a question came up at the last meeting and comments were made about the desire to work with the Army. He explained he asked how far along the County was with the Army and it sounds like they were pretty far along and progress was being made. Councilmember Holden asked that the City’s JDA representatives ask to see this progress. 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Patrick Burlingame, 3590 Snelling Avenue North, thanked the Council and staff for the work on the proclamation, resolution and letter that was sent to federal delegates. He noted in the last several weeks he met with staff and listened to residents. Through these interactions he has learned residents were feeling the effects of federal immigration enforcement agents and that the tools available to the City were limited. He appreciated the fact the City Council would be taking concrete steps to put the City’s position on the record and to escalate the City’s concerns to federal leaders. He asked how and when the City would be sharing the response the City receives from the federal delegation with residents. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES A. Public Inquiry Response from January 12, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting City Administrator Jagoe provided a verbal response to the inquiries that were raised at the January 12, 2026 City Council meeting. Councilmember Monson asked that these comments be sent to the speaker from the January 12, 2026 City Council meeting. Councilmember Weber commented he would have appreciated seeing this response prior to the meeting since it was a response from the City Council. 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS None.