My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 8:38:57 AM
Creation date
4/14/2026 8:38:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—MARCH 9, 2026 22 <br /> Public Works Directory/City Engineer Swearingen reported this topic would be coming to the <br /> City Council at the second meeting in April or first meeting in May. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau requested staff invite NYFS to attend a future City Council meeting in <br /> order to provide an update on their organization. <br /> Councilmember Rousseau stated she wanted the Council to discuss putting a moratorium in place <br /> for data centers. <br /> Councilmember Weber explained he supported the Council discussing the membership on the <br /> PTRC, discussing a moratorium on data centers and that staff invite NYFS to attend a future <br /> meeting. <br /> Councilmember Weber stated the Planning Commission's March meeting was canceled.He noted <br /> the Planning Commission would be reviewing the inclusionary housing ordinance in April. He <br /> commented on a meeting he had with a local non-profit regarding the City's inclusionary housing <br /> ordinance. He explained he learned the City of Arden Hills was 80% AMI for its rental units. He <br /> reported he believed the proposed inclusionary ordinance was aggressive but was not out of line. <br /> He indicated after learning that the City's rental units were already at 80% AMI, he supported <br /> lowering the requirements within the inclusionary ordinance to 60% AMI if a developer wished to <br /> receive density bonuses. <br /> Councilmember Weber commented that the Mayor made a statement when the Council was <br /> discussing the EDA appointments that he used the moment as a"gotcha"moment. He believed the <br /> Code of Conduct called for the Council to interpret each other's behavior in the best of light, with <br /> the best intentions. He was of the opinion he had the right to question the nominations that were <br /> made to a vital board for the City and this was not a"gotcha" moment as he was trying to get the <br /> best for the City. He wanted to ensure everything done from this bench was done in the light of day, <br /> clear, transparent and accountable. <br /> Councilmember Holden reported the National Guard had a celebration two weeks ago after one <br /> of the original Red Bulls from 1943 turned 103. She explained General Joe Sharkey was there. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated Councilmember Weber made a statement that as soon as the Mayor <br /> and Councilmember Holden found out his intent to try and redo it, they blocked it. She questioned <br /> where Councilmember Weber's best intent was in this situation. She stated best intentions go both <br /> ways, noting she had no idea this was her intent in this situation. She indicated she was not happy <br /> with the way things were going and she hoped the Council could do better. <br /> Councilmember Monson reported she supported the Council discussing the new membership <br /> number on the PTRC. In addition, she supported the EDC and PTRC Chairs attending an upcoming <br /> work session. She commented she was interested in discussing a moratorium on data centers and <br /> standalone storage facilities. <br /> Councilmember Monson stated she wanted the Council to discuss the structure of public hearings <br /> and new business items. She indicated she would like the City Council to take action on public <br /> hearings items after the public hearing was held and not under a new business item because this <br /> would be more accommodating to the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.