Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MARCH 9, 2026 7 <br />Mayor Grant said Staff can look at it and let us know. If we can save $30,000-$40,000 then we <br />could put that into a higher value structure. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we explored what the Public Works Staff <br />could do during the last Public Works park improvement project and the amount of coordination <br />added into that process means you aren't saving as much as you think you are. Resources are just <br />focused on something other than what they would be focused on. His opinion is he would rather <br />not use our forces to do that. <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said contractors generally do turnkey projects. Asking <br />them to accommodate us wanting to do work that they generally do, would be a surprise to them. <br />Mayor Grant said if we installed a playground structure where no structure existed before, that <br />would also be a turnkey project. <br />Councilmember Monson wanted to clarify her comments regarding Sampson. She didn't say it is <br />because Sampson is used less than Ingerson. She knows Sampson does get a lot of activity. The <br />people who use that park tend to have younger kids, like four and under. Her comment was if we <br />want to do something with the playground, there could possibly be some shifting in money. She <br />doesn't think Sampson us used less than Ingerson. <br />Councilmember Holden said she received a couple of complaints about Arden Oak and Freeway. <br />The comments were that those structures are oriented more towards little kids. If we do Ingerson, <br />we need something geared toward the 10-12-year-old group. <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said that can be accomplished through the RFP process. <br />We can request age -appropriate equipment based on public engagement and Staff knowledge. <br />Councilmember Weber said there was discussion of depressions in the ground at Ingerson because <br />of old trees being removed. He supports replacing trees where possible. It would be a large increase <br />in scope to re -grade the whole area. He thinks that may be out of range in the near term. He supports <br />removing dead and diseased trees and replacing them where possible. He likes the temporary <br />warming house, as opposed to a permanent structure. He always supports buckthorn removal but <br />that comes with an issue of maintenance. We can pay to remove it all, but it will come back within <br />a couple of years. He isn't sure that's a worthwhile investment unless we have a plan for controlling <br />that regrowth. He supports the dog park improvements. He likes the idea of increasing access to the <br />rental structure so users can easily drop off their supplies. <br />Councilmember Holden said in the past it was recommended we used the same playground <br />equipment at all parks for ease of replacement. She asked if that is still an issue. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed that was an advantage of using one <br />provider. By selecting one vendor we were limited by the quality of products from that vendor. <br />During the last park improvement project we reached out to other vendors and ended up going with <br />a different vendor whose products had a lot of interest from the community. Staff believe having a <br />larger vendor pool will allow us to get a better product in the long run. <br />Councilmember Holden said we have enough money in the tree fund to fill all these parks with <br />trees. So that shouldn't be an issue. <br />