My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
04-13-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 9:32:49 AM
Creation date
4/14/2026 9:12:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — MARCH 9, 2026 2 <br />City Administrator Jagoe indicated the spine road should be bid this fall. <br />3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL <br />Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham Avenue, reported in 2023 the City Council shifted appointment <br />authority for most commissions and committees from the Mayor to all members of the Council, <br />with all appointments still subject to Council approval. Following that change and in an effort to <br />establish a clear and transparent appointment process, the Council created clear administrative <br />processes to publicize vacancies, conduct formal documented interviews, and use a fixed set of <br />questions in those interviews in order to establish a fair and accountable selection process. He <br />reported the Mayor recently ignored this effort in the recent interviews and appointments for the <br />EDA's two new members. He stated the EDA was a State authorized public corporation with <br />bonding, taxing and property powers with six -year terms. He indicated these appointments should <br />warrant more, not less public scrutiny. He noted that while State law authorizes the Mayor alone to <br />nominate certain members of the EDA, subject to the approval of the full Council, the way in which <br />the Mayor executed this authority is the issue. He noted the Mayor collected a small set of resumes, <br />chose from them the two he wanted to appoint with no interviews or consultation with other <br />Councilmembers. He stated the Mayor then buried the appointments on the Consent Agenda at the <br />January 12, 2026, City Council meeting effectively shielding the appointments from the other <br />Councilmembers. He reported that when Councilmember Weber questioned the appointment <br />process, the Mayor aggressively and successfully employed Roberts Rules of Order to end the <br />discussion, not once, but twice (on January 12 and February 9). He understood State law allows the <br />Mayor to make these appointments and by wrapping them up in the Consent Agenda the Mayor <br />received approval for the appointments as required. The issue, however, was that the Mayor ignored <br />the process created by the Council to establish a transparent appointment process and then <br />aggressively prevented any open discussion of his maneuver. He reported this reveals the Mayor's <br />willingness to resort to procedural manipulation to avoid transparent processes in the governing of <br />the City. <br />Gregg Larson, 3377 North Snelling Avenue, spoke to the Council regarding the recent <br />appointments to the EDA. He reported he has not been able to find the Resolution that establishes <br />the EDA. He requested the City Administrator provide him with this Resolution. He explained that <br />State Statute could allow the authority to exercise many powers, including employment of persons, <br />use of eminent domain, holding, conveying or selling property, awarding contracts, issuing bonds, <br />levying taxes or assessments and creating economic development districts. He reported this was a <br />fairly powerful organization. He understood David Grant did not consult with Councilmembers <br />regarding the process for appointing two members from the EDC to serve on the EDA, nor did the <br />Mayor invite any Councilmembers to sit in on the interviews. He indicated the individuals were not <br />discussed at prior work sessions or Council meetings. He stated given the possibly statutory powers <br />of the EDA, it was difficult for him to understand why there was not a rigorous screening of <br />potential candidates that involved other Councilmembers and public review prior to the January 12 <br />City Council meeting when the two names showed up on the Consent Agenda. It was also difficult <br />for him to understand why David Grant decided on the two candidates from the pool of EDC <br />Commission members who may be qualified but are not Arden Hills residents. He explained it was <br />a disappointment that after the appointments were approved, David Grant attempted further end <br />runs around the City Council. He recommended the two non-resident appointments to the EDA be <br />reconsidered by the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.