My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 2:04:41 PM
Creation date
4/14/2026 2:04:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MARCH 9, 2026 8 <br />Councilmember Monson is concerned about the low amount budgeted for the Ingerson <br />playground structure. She asked what we could do to find additional money or adjust the budget to <br />accommodate a better structure there. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said when Finance Director Yang is back in the office, she can talk with <br />her and Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen about how those dollars could be <br />redistributed. She will share an update with Council after that discussion with Staff. <br />Mayor Grant said Public Works kind of like having fewer trees making it easier to mow, until they <br />hit one of those pock marks. It was stated earlier that Ingerson gets heavy use in the winter because <br />of the sledding hill. He agrees with replacing trees where we can, but we can't put trees on that hill <br />and expect it to remain a sledding hill. <br />Councilmember Rousseau wants to think about what happened with Floral and Cummings vs. the <br />product we got at Arden Oaks and Freeway. She's heard positive feedback about Arden Oaks and <br />Freeway. The comment she heard was that Floral and specifically Cummings didn't meet the size <br />of the previous structure. Do we feel like the product we will get will be similar to Floral and <br />Cummings or will it be closer to the Arden Oaks and Freeway structures? <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we will be aiming to get the Arden Oaks <br />and Freeway response. He thinks Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky's approach is a better <br />way to handle this. We haven't done it that way in the past and he's looking forward to seeing how <br />that goes. <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said she believes the best value approach will produce <br />a playground that is well loved and functional. When we are very clear about what we want, it's <br />incredible what these companies can come up with, within our parameters. When we tell them an <br />amount and ask for their best, they will give you their best product because they know they are <br />competing against other companies. <br />Councilmember Holden said she thinks there may be grants available for the trail connection in <br />Ingerson. She would rather have a really nice playground structure, which grants can't cover. Is it <br />feasible to remove the trail connections and use that money for the park and play structure? <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the trail connection is within the same <br />PIR fund. If Council wants to eliminate the trail connection and move the programmed funding to <br />the play structure, we can do that. He doesn't know of any grants that would apply to this specific <br />trail connection. There is a sanitary sewer easement. We were going to install the trail over that <br />easement. We have the space and this has been in the plan. <br />Councilmember Holden asked when the Fernwood Channel is scheduled. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said 2028. He said that it is a good point that <br />we could do these improvements later in the 2028 PMP. <br />Mayor Grant asked if Staff needed any further information or feedback. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.