My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-02-26 JDA WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Minutes
>
2026
>
02-02-26 JDA WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2026 2:29:55 PM
Creation date
5/1/2026 2:29:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Monson summarized it appears the size of this project was really tough and it <br />was hard to find a single developer to complete this project. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh stated after sitting in on negotiations last year, the expertise of any <br />one developer was in question. She explained if the project were more broken up the County <br />would be able to have money to reinvest back into the project. <br />Commissioner Weber anticipated the City would have a hard time with the site being sold in <br />numerous parcels. While he understood this has benefits, he feared the final product could be <br />compromised. He stated there may be parcels remaining within the project area that stay <br />undeveloped because they are less desirable. He questioned if there would be coordination <br />between the City and the County on the land sale negotiations. Director Jagoe indicated a <br />cooperative agreement would have to be in place to address parks, infrastructure, phasing and <br />the repayment of costs. <br />Chair Wicklund stated it would be his preference to have staff research the hybrid approach <br />and consider how the California parcel could be split into five to ten sections. He indicated if the <br />JDA were to proceed in this manner, parcels could begin to be sold off and if this wasn’t <br />working the JDA could move back to the lead developer scenario. <br />Commissioner Weber explained he generally agreed with this recommendation but he stated <br />there were other factors to consider such as which parcels were the most developable. <br />Commissioner Miller supported the JDA pursuing a hybrid model for the development of Rice <br />Creek Commons. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh encouraged staff to consider what the JDA was not thinking about <br />if the hybrid model were to move forward. She indicated staff would have to consider what was <br />the most logical manner in which to move forward with the development of this project and <br />how it should be staged or phased. <br />Commissioner Monson stated she was not sold on the hybrid approach. She was of the opinion <br />it was dangerous to ask the County to do development work given the fact that they were a <br />governing body. <br />Chair Wicklund indicated this was why he would like to allow staff the time to research the <br />options for a hybrid approach. <br />Commissioner Jebens-Singh recalled that the hybrid approach was brought up by a <br />Commissioner for consideration. She supported the JDA learning more about this option and if <br />there were any red flags with the hybrid approach. <br />The consensus of the JDA was to direct staff to pursue a hybrid approach and to report back to <br />the JDA in 90 days.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.