My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-2026 Special JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2026
>
03-10-2026 Special JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2026 2:35:38 PM
Creation date
5/1/2026 2:34:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Wicklund encouraged staff to further consider who would be submitting the TRC <br />amendment request. Public Works Director Mazzitello indicated it was the County’s desire to <br />have a collaborative application from the City, County and JDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson inquired why the plans were designed with 10-foot trails when the TRC <br />calls for 12-foot trails. Public Works Director Mazzitello explained there were only two outliers <br />and noted the County’s requirement was followed for this trail because the trail would be <br />located on County right of way. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson explained the TRC was completed through coordination between the <br />City and County. She cautioned the County from designing plans that meet County <br />requirements and not the TRC requirements. <br /> <br />The consensus of the JDA was to support a 10-foot trailway width within RCC. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund asked that the discussion now focus on the lighting requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Fosmo reviewed the TRC Amendment Item #2 which addressed street lighting spacing. He <br />stated the 40-foot light spacing requirement was cost prohibitive. He noted typical spacing was <br />150 to 200 feet. He explained the typical lighting requirements from MNDOT were 210 to 240 <br />feet. He discussed how lighting was spaced along Rice Creek Parkway and County Road <br />E/Snelling Avenue noting the distance for lighting was 140 to 200 feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber inquired if a photometric survey or modeling was completed. He <br />indicated he was concerned with the fact the lights would be 40 feet apart and recommended <br />the spacing be larger. He reported he would like to see different distances modeled to see if <br />there were any dark spots prior to moving forward with a TRC amendment for street lighting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked what the County’s typical light spacing standards were. She inquired <br />if the trail would be owned by the City or County. Public Works Director Mazzitello stated as a <br />general rule the County does not light County roads but rather lights intersections. He <br />explained the trail would be owned by the County because the trail would be located within <br />County right of way but the City would be responsible for the trail maintenance. He clarified the <br />City would be the owner and operator of the lights. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired if the County would be receiving additional requests to have trails <br />lit if the trail within RCC were lit by the County. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber indicated the County may not typically light its trails, but the TRC was <br />agreed upon by the City and County and he would like to see the proposed design standards <br />followed. He requested the photometric survey be created for the spine road with the lighting <br />at 40 feet and other distances in order for the JDA to better understand the proposed changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.