Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 13 <br /> wealth in their home. She feared that the proposed massive zoning change would impact the value <br /> of homes and livability in the northern section of the City, where TCAAP looms with 5,000 people <br /> being added to the community and North Heights would be adding 1,200. She reported the addition <br /> of 6,200 people would be an assault. She recommended action on this item be tabled or denied until <br /> there was transparent and unambiguous public scrutiny. She stated she wanted to better understand <br /> how northern Arden Hills would be impacted by an additional 6,200 residents. She was irritated by <br /> how the County was proposing a roundabout at TCAAP. She asked that the City speak with the <br /> County regarding this matter. She was of the opinion this was an ambiguous document, noting <br /> northern Arden Hills has 470 townhouses that qualify for purchase assistance and 280 mobile <br /> homes that sit near the arsenal site that were low income. She explained Arden Hills also has <br /> apartment complexes in the community. She said the proposed document gave too much power to <br /> too few. She stated affordability was utter propaganda given that there has been 25% inflation in <br /> the last five years. She indicated the State of Minnesota treats taxpayer money with complacency <br /> and willful ignorance, which meant the City and its residents will be taxed for those mistakes to the <br /> tune of billions of dollars. She recommended this document not move forward until the Council <br /> provides transparency and clarity answer the question of affordability for whom and from whom. <br /> Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated there was a growing housing crisis and half of renters were <br /> cost burdened. She encouraged the City to care about the community and help alleviate this <br /> problem. She reported of the eight suburbs, the City was considering the weakest and lowest <br /> ordinance. She indicated this was very disappointing. She asked that the Council be leaders when <br /> it comes to affordable housing. She discussed how Roseville had added 500 affordable units in <br /> recent years and Arden Hills has not added a single affordable unit through the three senior housing <br /> developments. She encouraged the City Council to ditch the 80%AMI option. She reported teachers <br /> could only afford to live in a one-bedroom apartments at 50% AMI and seniors living on a fixed <br /> income would fall into the 30% AMI bracket. She recommended the Lexington Avenue corridor <br /> be zoned for affordable housing only. She believed this was the perfect location to develop <br /> affordable housing at 60% AMI or below. She urged the City to not lose the opportunity to have <br /> meaningful affordable housing in Arden Hills. <br /> Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham Avenue, stated he was a member of the Planning Commission but was <br /> speaking his own opinions. He reported since 2020 the City has added approximately 200 housing <br /> units of senior housing in two separate developments. He indicated another development was <br /> coming near North Heights Church that would add another 200 units. He commented it was a good <br /> thing to be adding new units to the community but he questioned why affordability was not <br /> considered within any of these projects. He stated the North Heights developer came before the <br /> City last year for a final consideration and the Planning Commission raised the issue of affordable <br /> housing. He noted the Planning Commission was advised by the City Attorney that the City had no <br /> basis to raise this issue because the City had no ordinance or policy in place to require affordable <br /> housing. He appreciated how this ordinance would provide the City with the legal authority to <br /> address affordable housing with future developers. He urged the Council to pass this ordinance as <br /> recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> Chris Hughes, 1535 Snelling Avenue North, commented it was obvious to him that approving this <br /> Ordinance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.He supported the City having housing <br /> choices that were affordable to families at various income levels. He stated safe, stable and <br /> affordable housing provides measurable health and economic benefits for the community. He <br /> discussed how service workers, teachers, seniors and other essential personnel were in need of <br /> affordable housing in the community. He recommended the City also work to protect the naturally <br />