My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-26-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
04-27-26-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2026 9:33:01 AM
Creation date
5/12/2026 9:32:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 18 <br /> Community Development Director Reilly commented this document would not be retroactive, <br /> but if any existing apartment building were to redevelop or be rehabilitated to impact the number <br /> of units or rental rates the ordinance would affect what happens next with these properties. <br /> Mayor Grant asked what staff meant by Findings of Fact. <br /> Community Development Director Reilly explained the Findings of Fact match the findings from <br /> the Planning Commission and could be incorporated within the ordinance code language. <br /> Mayor Grant recommended the findings be omitted for ease of reading. <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the work staff was doing to update the zoning code. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned if Item Sub 2E meant affordable housing units could be created without <br /> TIF or subsidies. <br /> Community Development Director Reilly reported this provision states affordable units would <br /> not be tied to a request for financial assistance and does not prevent the City from responding to a <br /> request for financial assistance. <br /> Mayor Grant stated he supported the TBI (Total Buy In) paragraph should be stricken. He <br /> indicated he was surprised by the inclusion of 30%AMI. He understood the Planning Commission <br /> discussed this matter at length and wanted this document to closely align with Shoreview, noting <br /> Shoreview does not have a 30% AMI provision. He spoke to how it would be difficult for <br /> developers to have deeply affordable units requiring the same design standards as the non- <br /> affordable units. <br /> Community Development Director Reilly stated research suggests this is not true,but developers <br /> will tell the Council that it is. <br /> Mayor Grant questioned why the City would require age restricted (55+) developments to have a <br /> three-bedroom unit. <br /> Community Development Director Reilly commented these developers typically would not put <br /> three-bedroom units into a senior complex, even if there was interest. However, three-bedroom <br /> units often rent first because they are the hardest to find. <br /> Mayor Grant anticipated requiring an age-restricted development to have three-bedroom units <br /> could make the proforma or finances more difficult. He suggested the 140% AMI percentage not <br /> be allowed in inclusionary housing. He hoped the Council could have more discussion on this topic. <br /> He recommended the density bonus percentage be reconsidered. He suggested language be added <br /> to the ordinance that states the bonus units could be built to different standards and will be rented <br /> at market rate, noting none of the bonus units have to be affordable. He spoke to the covenant <br /> language and questioned what the terms "runs with the land" and "required period"meant. <br /> City Attorney Kirchoff explained the required period was 20 years and reported runs with the land <br /> meant documentation would be recorded against the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.