My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-26 WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
04-27-26 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2026 7:56:10 AM
Creation date
5/14/2026 7:56:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 3 <br />Mr. Fosmo said 35 mph. <br />Councilmember Weber said he supported this at the Joint Development Authority (JDA) meeting <br />and still does. If 10-foot trails are the norm, he thinks 10-foot trails on each side and 5-foot shoulders <br />on each side is sufficient. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if we ever anticipate having buses. <br />Mr. Fosmo said the corridor is wide enough to accommodate a future transit line. We would <br />anticipate bus traffic to be part of development. There are no bus stops delineated at this time but <br />the corridor and green space are wide enough to construct future bus stops. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if they have had any outreach to the biking community to get <br />their opinion. <br />Mr. Mazzitello said the biking community are very vocal about all Ramsey County projects. What <br />they say is they want to be able to commute through the development without going through <br />subdivisions. They are interested in having a nice through -route for commuter bikes. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if those comments could be shared. <br />Mr. Mazzitello said the comments are scattered throughout their work. Before construction and <br />during public engagement they will have that conversation. <br />Councilmember Monson said there was a lot of discussion at the JDA. She thinks it feels like we <br />are taking something away by going from 12 feet to 10 feet. She struggled with that a little. What <br />convinced her is that it's on both sides of the road. She also hopes it will help avoid delays for <br />watershed permitting. She liked that it won't restrict other parts of development. The current trails <br />are 8 feet and they're fine. This is better. Another point made at the JDA is a 10-foot trail can be <br />plowed in a single pass vs. a 12-foot trail that would either be plowed at 10 feet or Public Works <br />would have to plow it twice. <br />Mayor Grant said RCWD originally wanted 12 feet. If they are okay with it being 10 feet, he is <br />okay with that. <br />Councilmember Holden said we would have had a slightly larger stormwater pond with a 12-foot <br />trail vs. a 10-foot trail. She asked if that was correct. <br />Mr. Fosmo said all of the water will still flow to storm water treatment. It's the way the district <br />calculates their credits. Anytime water runs off of something; paved trails, buildings, etc., the <br />RCWD says treatment must be provided. Having 12-foot trails means that has to be accounted for <br />in the calculation, which takes up space within the development. <br />Councilmember Holden said we have a lot of things that were made for the 100-year storm. We <br />could see multiple 100-year storms. She asked if the way they calculate the volume in the <br />stormwater ponds has changed at all. <br />Mr. Fosmo said those are two separate things. How you calculate for the flood event accounts for <br />everything. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.