My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 04-13-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCP 04-13-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:30 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:47:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />@ ~~ ~~ <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - MARCH 16. 1998 2 <br /> . <br />Mr. Ringwald suggested that, with this layout, it appeared to serve the needs of the City, Ramsey <br />County, and MnDOT equally well, and should be considered a negotiating point with those <br />agencies. <br />Mr. Fritsioger reminded Couocilmembers that the proposed ramp to the north through TCAAP <br />property is a long-term venture. Mr. Brown suggested a reverse loop would be an alternative, <br />should the City not be able to acquire needed TCAAP property in a timely fashion. <br />Mr. Fritsinger referred to the City of Shoreview's recent traffic study regarding the University of <br />Minnesota property. Mr. Fritsinger specifically referred to County Road I, and the study's <br />assumption of no development occurring on the TCAAP site. Mr. Fritsinger stated that staff had <br />requested a meeting with the City of Shoreview to review various assumptions ofthe traffic <br />study. <br />Further discussion included the minimum alternative suggested by BRW, and whieh alternative <br />would better serve the City's short and long-term traffic needs. It was the consensus of <br />Councilmembers and staff that a grade separation, as presented in Layout No.2, would better <br />serve the City, and resolve several intersections problems. Mr. Brown pointed out that, with <br />Layout No.2, some ponding issues in the SE quadrant need to be addressed. <br />Staff was directed to initiate discussions with Ramsey County and MnDOT, suggesting Layout . <br />No.2 as the City's minimum request, accelerating the schedule on an 1-35W bridge, future <br />interchange proposals and requirements at Gateway Boulevard; and to request definition ofthe <br />long-term intentions of MnDot regarding the future functions of Highway 10 and the I-35W <br />corridor. <br />Mayor Probst revised the order of the agenda to accommodate the consultants present for the City <br />Hall presentation, <br />d. City Hall <br />Mr. Fritsinger reviewed various revisions to the proposed City Hall design process since the last <br />time this topic was brought before the Council. Jeanne Sterner and Tom Deangelo, ofthe <br />Architectural Alliance, reviewed revised preliminary building design and cost estimates. <br />Discussion items included, a conservative estimate of the proposed project budget as it relates to <br />the latest preliminary design; storm water ponding requirements; the agreement by Ramsey <br />County for a full curb cut and intersection on Highway 96; and design changes in the lower level. <br />Ms. Sterner stated that the estimated budget of $1.9 million detail represented a building design <br />of 16,105 square feet. Since this budget had been initially formulated, there had been elimination <br />of additional square tootage. The revised preliminary design dated March 16, 1998, was for a . <br />building of approximately 14,900 square feet. This reduction has been achieved by moving the <br />employee lunchroom to the first floor, and the lower level being constructed as all open space, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.