Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ ~~ ~1 , <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 30 1998 2 <br />Council member Hicks stated based on his discussion with Mr. Post, this means the City would . <br />be responsible for approximately 50% of the total construction costs and, from that point of view, <br />he supports the recommended change. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br /> motion to adopt Resolution #98-33, Revising the 1998 Street Improvement <br /> Assessment Rates. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />Mayor Probst explained the result of this action is a reduction in assessments from $48.85 per <br />foot for reconstruction to $39.98 per foot. All of the non-curb and gutter Surface Water <br />Management (SWM) costs will be paid by the SWM Utility Fund. <br />Councilmember Malone explained the City has a policy to provide a starting point in determining <br />assessments and the philosophy behind that policy is that the other tax payers of the City who are <br />not receiving a street improvement are paying for one-half of the street improvement costs and <br />those directly benefitting pay one-quarter of the cost (if there are homes on both sides of the <br />street). He advised of the formula which considers the front footage for determining the rate to <br />be charged. Councilmember Malone provided a brief explanation of the State Statutes which <br />govern the assessment of improvements based on the value received of the capital improvement <br />based on the highest and best use of the land. <br />Councilmember Malone explained the rate is based on the project footage and anticipated <br />construction costs. The Council then reviews the numbers and takes into consideration special . <br />situations such as unusually shaped lots. He explained that according to State Statutes, the <br />"bottom line" is the Council's determination. Councilmember Malone then read each of the <br />addresses involved in the 1998 Street Improvement Project and advised of the original <br />assessment noticed and proposed reduced assessment to be levied. <br />Deanne Howard, 4057 Fairview Avenue N., asked if there will be any allowance made for <br />underground sprinkling systems that need to be relocated. Mayor Probst stated ifthe sprinkling <br />system is located too close to the curb, it will be the resident's responsibility to relocate the <br />sprinkling system or cover the damage. <br />Mr. Gregg Brown, City Engineer, explained staff will hold a preconstruction meeting with the <br />contractor and any notification to residents regarding irrigation systems or other issues will be <br />provided along with telephone numbers if residents need further information. Residents will also <br />be advised of where the irrigation system nee<;l;\Ji2be moyedto. Mr.Browruo:stimated the <br />project, if approved by the Council, could start mid-May. <br />Dan Coughlin, 8468 Spring Lake Road, Mounds View, stated he just went through a similar <br />situation in Mounds View with similar assessment rates but, after working with a road estimator, <br />they found the cost would be reduced by one-half without curb and gutter. He reported about a <br />contractor who provided a bid at a lower cost per foot than is being proposed tonight. <br /> . <br />