CCP 10-13-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT ., ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 28, 1998 6 Councilmember Malone referred to the previous suggestion of running the lines along others - through the Arsenal. Even if the line would be longer, the poles are already in place and there should be some cost reduction for this. Mr. Johnson stated the line was built during World War II. Most of it isn't up to current standards and would have to be replaced in order to install a main line feeder. While the feeder could be put on the poles, the poles are not tall enough and there is not sufficient separation between the poles. Mayor Probst asked ifmost of the lines have been abandoned. Mr. Johnson stated they are still being used by a few sites. Mayor Probst restated his view that the City is not happy with running overhead lines and feels there are other options. He asked if there is a schedule set for the job and, if so, who controls it. Mr. Johnson stated they hope to have it completed by the end ofthe year, or before the ground freezes, they just have to present the required permits to begin working. Mayor Probst asked ifNSP has the permits from the County. Mr. Johnson indicated they have been drawn up and Mr. Wertish stated he believes they have received the permit. Mayor Probst voiced his concern for the idea that NSP could show up at any time and begin work on the line. Mr. Wertish held to his belief that NSP has exhausted all of their practical options. He stated he - will bring the plans back to NSP for further review but it is not always possible to satisfy every City when it comes to aesthetic issues. Mayor Probst reconfirmed the Council's concern that the line is already underground and should not be too difficult to replace, but NSP is choosing not to because of financial reasons. He noted if the line must go overhead, the City may want to suggest better routes so as not to spread lines out over the entire area. He stated the City will work further with Staff to gain a better understanding of the issue and asked Mr. Wert ish to express the City's concerns to NSP. B. 1369 Forest Lane, Code Enforcement Update Mr. Ringwald stated Mr. Nixon has had several deadlines to supply information regarding building permits. The contractor chosen by Mr. Nixon does not have a valid State Contractors License. Staff has not received verification of his financing source and, although Mr. Nixon has made some progress, there are major issues needing to be solved. He also pointed out, in the event the financing cannot be secured, Mr. Nixon would like the opportunity to tear the home down himself. If the Council allows this option, Staff would recommend placing a time limit for the demolition. Mr. Nixon explained his contractor gave him his employers' license number and he was not aware this would not be sufficient. He does not understand why he is required to hire a licensed contractor. Mr. Ringwald indicated the Code states once you lose your occupancy permit, you - must use a State Licensed Contractor for the repairs. Typically a home owner is looking at minor additions and corrections to bring the home up to Code compliance.