My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-2026 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2026
>
04-08-2026 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2026 4:30:15 PM
Creation date
5/14/2026 4:30:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 4, 2026 5 <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission for <br />Planning Case Planning Case 26-001 for a Sign Standard Adjustment through the Site Plan <br />Review: <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br /> <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted. Any <br />significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development <br />Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City <br />Council. <br />2. A separate sign permit shall be required for each proposed sign. <br />3. All signage shall meet all other requirements of Sign District 7. <br /> <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Collins opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund inquired if staff had any examples where graphics signs have been <br />permitted in this type of zoning district. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen explained she did not have an example for this zoning district. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund questioned how the city viewed the sculpture. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen indicated the sculpture did not have any words and therefore was not <br />considered a sign. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Reilly reported the statue was not a sign, it was a sculpture. <br />He explained art was not considered a sign and was not included in the sign request. He stated <br />the U.S. Constitution only allows the city to regulate time, manner, and place when it comes to <br />signs. He commented further on how the phoenix is considered graphic art. <br /> <br />Lake Johanna Fire Chief Tim Boehlke addressed the Planning Commission and explained the <br />statue was not part of the sign request. He indicated the statue was included in the site plans, but <br />he was uncertain the statue would move forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson inquired if the fire station was located on County Road E, would the <br />building be allowed to have more signs. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen explained generally the sign districts that have frontage along <br />Lexington Avenue have the highest allotment and those properties along County Road E would <br />have the second highest allotment. She reported this property was located within Sign District 7, <br />which allowed for less available signage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson asked what the total wall signage was for the fire station. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Fransen indicated the sign code allows for a total of 45 square feet of wall <br />signage for the site and the request is for 163 square feet of wall signage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.