Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> --- <br /> I <br /> I. <br /> I 11l1~_1I February 9, 1998 <br /> I <br /> I Honorable Mayor and <br /> B R W INC. Members of the City Council <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> I 1450 West Highway 96 <br /> Arden Hills, MN 55112 <br /> I ATfN: Mr. Duane Stafford <br /> Public Works Director <br /> RE: Feasibility Study and Report for the <br /> I Elimination of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station # II <br /> I Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council: <br /> PJanning <br /> Transportation The enclosed feasibility report has been prepared for possible elimination of sanitary sewer <br /> .g,n,,,,ng Lift Station # II, as authorized by the City Council at the December 8, 1997, Council meeting. <br /> I bon Db'gn The feasibility report details three alternatives to be considered (including maintaining the <br /> status quo) and their respective project scopes, provides additional information regarding the <br /> Thresher Square proposed improvements and considers other direction from City staff. <br /> I 700 Third Street So. <br /> Minneapolis, The scope of the project includes the construction ofa gravity sanitary sewer main between <br /> MN 554]5 existing Lift Station # II located near the intersection of Prior A venue and Highway 96 and <br /> I 612/370-0700 the trunk sanitary line recently constructed along 14th Street N.E. The project also includes <br /> Fax 6]2/370--1378 the removal of the existing lift station and abandonment and relocation of other existing <br /> sanitary sewer mains in the project area. <br /> I Denver <br /> l\:liJwaukee Information utilized in the preparation of this report includes aerial mapping, as-built plans, <br /> Minneapolis preliminary layout plans for Highway 96, data provided by City staff, and other information <br /> I. New,uk from field investigations and surveys of the site. All available information was reviewed and <br /> Orlando considered to determine the feasibility of the proposed project. <br /> Phoenix <br /> Portland We are of the opinion that the project as outlined in this report has merit would require a <br /> I San Diego substantial outlay from the City Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund in order to be constructed. The <br /> SeatHe City Council must weigh the anticipated long-term benefits of the project with the initial <br /> cap ital cost. <br /> I Sincerely, <br /> I ~~pL~ <br /> ,- Arden Hi s C Engineer <br /> I <br />