Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ ~~ ~y <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIl. - FEBRUARY 23. 1998 U 2 <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a . <br /> motion to approve the Consent Calendar as listed above and authorize execution <br /> of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously <br /> (3-0). <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Probst invited those present to come forward and address the Council on any items not <br /> already on the agenda. There were no public comments. <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Resolution #98-27, Establishing the 1998 Street Improvement Assessment Rates <br /> Mr. Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, explained that the Council is asked to <br /> adopt Resolution #98-27, which establishes the 1998 street improvement assessment rates of <br /> $48.85 per assessable front foot for complete street reconstruction and $5.20 per assessable <br /> foot for bituminous overlay _ He noted this is slightly less than indicated in the feasibility <br /> report as a result of changes in the scope of work recommended for 1998. He noted the <br /> resolution includes these rates which are based on the revised feasibility report completed by <br /> BRW, and are being proposed at the direction of the City Council as suggested in the <br /> Assessment Policy. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Aplikowski, Mr. Stafford reviewed the streets that will be . <br /> included in the 1998 Street Improvement Project. <br /> Mayor Probst asked if the proposed rates are based on the remaining streets which reflect the <br /> City's policy to assess 50% of the cost. Mr. Stafford stated this is correct. <br /> Mike Dwelly, 2048 Stowe Avenue, stated last year the rates were at $37 per foot and inquired <br /> why it is so much higher this year. Mayor Probst explained the rates are being driven by the <br /> anticipated costs for this work. <br /> Mr. DweUy stated he lives on Stowe Avenue which has been there for 40+ years and the <br /> asphalt has never been improved over the last 30 years. He noted that two years ago, Ramsey <br /> County would have upgraded it at no cost to the residents but the City decided to swap this <br /> road with the County. Now the City wants to upgrade it and assess the residents for part of the <br /> cost. He objected to adding inflationary factors into the rate since it could have been done two <br /> years ago at a cheaper rate. <br /> Mayor Probst stated he is unable to "turn back the clock" to two years ago but, since one-half <br /> is in the City of New Brighton it could not have been done then. Mr. Dwelly stated Ramsey <br /> County was willing to do maintenance on the street two years ago at no cost to the homeowner <br /> but then the City decided to swap the roads. He stated to be fair to the residents, it should be . <br /> done at a cheaper rate than proposed. <br />