My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-16-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCP 03-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:14:38 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:48:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> ~ Summary <br /> This report has presented the results of various analyses performed around the intersection of <br /> Highway 96 and Highway lOin order to provide the Council with the information necessary to <br /> I select the best fit design of the intersection for Arden Hills. The traffic analyses indicates that <br /> the current intersection functions poorly at PM Peak Hours and will continue to decline unless <br /> the intersection is grade separated or Highway 10 is expanded to six through lanes. The <br /> I traffic model also indicated that a key access point to a redeveloped TCAAP site would need <br /> to be located along Highway 10 between Highway 96 and Interstate 35W. The Highway 96 and <br /> Highway 10 intersection is limited in the role it can play relative to future. access to the TCAAP <br /> I site. <br /> Four basic alternative layouts were considered for the Highway 10 and Highway 961nterchange. <br /> I All four are constructab1e but have widely varying implications relative to cost, private property, <br /> safety, access and adaptability for the future. Layout #1 maintains the full access at-grade <br /> intersection and extends Old Highway 10 across Round Lake to Gateway Boulevard. Layout #2 <br /> I and layout #3 provide improvement to traffic operations for today and into the future while <br /> providing access for businesses and residents in the Highway 96/10 Triangle and the TCAAP <br /> site as well as other City residents. Layout #4 represents a possible future condition where the <br /> I north access ramps have been removed to allow for a new full access interchange on Highway 10 <br /> serving a redeveloped TCAAP site and Highway 96/1 0 Triangle. Layout #4 could be <br /> constructed today but would pose serious access hardships on the Highway 96/1 0 Triangle <br /> . properties and TCAAP operations. <br /> Budget cost estimates and property acquisition estimates have been provided to assist with <br /> I comparing the relative merits of the alternatives. Several other considerations have been <br /> discussed as well including pedestrian access, implications to the alignment of gateway <br /> boulevard, gateway business district access and storm drainage which are affected greatly by the <br /> I various alternatives. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> l' 18 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.