Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> DRAFT <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 10, 1998 6 <br />Councilmember Larson inquired regarding the mobilization funds which were withheld. Mr. <br />Brown explained that the contractor was to be paid $30,000 for mobilization, has received only . <br />about $5,000. Typically, payment of the mobilization money is part of Pay Estimate #1 but the <br />City withheld that. In addition, the original completion date is coming up shortly. Mr. Brown <br />eXplained that so far with interim completion dates, the contractor was late by ten or more days <br />on all segments except for Edgewater Avenue. The final completion date is a week from this <br />Friday. The City could get liquidated damages of$500 per day if the project is not completed by <br />this date. However, a damage claim would require legal action. <br />Council member Larson asked if there was some other way to capture the contractor's attention in <br />paying this request, and if it is possible to further withhold payment. Mr. Brown said this could <br />be done, but the City only paid about $5,000 of the $30,000 mobilization which would normally <br />have been 100% paid with Pay Estimate #1. <br />Mr. Fritsinger advised that the Council has, in the past, withheld payment above and beyond the <br />typical retainage. However, the City Attorney has expressed concern about the legal ability to do <br />that for an extended period of time and indicated the City cannot arbitrarily withhold funds. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski suggested the Councilmembers remember this when considering the <br />next contract award. She stated Mr. Schifsky should be informed ofthe Council's concern either <br />by a letter or verbal comment. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a <br /> motion to approve Pay Estimate #2 to T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. for 1998 Street . <br /> Improvements in the amount of$212,464.96 subject to a 5% retainage. The <br /> motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br />Mr. Fritsinger advised the Council that Mr. Post and Mr. Stafford visited the maintenance facility <br />that the City of Hutchinson shares with the State and County. This was a fact finding effort <br />related to the financing agreements and operations. He advised that some good information was <br />reccived which will be helpful for the Finance Committee. <br />Mr. Fritsinger said the Planning Commission approved the site plan and Special Use Permit for <br />the proposed City Hall. The Commission's discussion centered on the sizc of the facility and <br />whether it was large enough for future expansion and the size and use for the community room. <br />Other key areas with the entry area into the facility, the roof slope down to the entrance, and <br />concern about ice and snow accumulation. The architects will be looking at these concerns and <br />staff will meet with them next week. A further report will be made at the August 31, 1998, <br />Council meeting. <br />Mr. Fritsinger raised the issue of the need for a larger capacity copy machine for the <br />administrative offices since current machines are not adequate for the number of copies being <br />made and there have been many breakdowns. Mr. Fritsinger reported on the number of machines . <br />which have becn viewed and the proposal from Xerox for a copier that is quicker and offers more <br />time-saving advanced features. However, $10,000 had been budgeted for a new copier and the <br />