Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> _n <br /> ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - OCTOBER 7, 1998 DRAFT 4 <br /> Commissioner Nelson moved, seconded by Commissioner Sand, to recommend approval . <br /> of Planning Case #98-24, CSM Corporation, 4295 Lexington Avenue, Site Plan with the <br /> conditions amended as follows: In condition number four, add the words "utility and <br /> pedestrian access" after "vehicular" and change address number from 4419 to 4265 <br /> Lexington Avenue. Remove condition number five and change number six to number <br /> five. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> PLANNING CASE #98-25 _ BRETT DALLMANN - 3564 N. SNELLING A VENUE - <br /> V ARIANCE (FRONT YARD SETBACK) - PUBI .IC HEARING <br /> Ms. Randall explained that the applicant is requesting approval of a front yard setback variance <br /> (14 feet proposed, when 40 feet is required) for a garage and family room addition on a single <br /> family lot zoned R-l. The proposal is to remove a single car garage and breezeway in order to <br /> build a 25 foot by 26 foot garage and a 24 foot by 26 foot family room. The property is located <br /> near the comer of Snelling A venue and County Road E. When the applicant conducted a survey <br /> they discovered that the portion of Snelling A venue in front of their home was constructed about <br /> 96 feet from the property line. In the future there is a possibility the road may be reconstructed <br /> in a location which places the edge of the road in closer proximity to the property line. Currently <br /> the road is encroaching on park property. <br /> The applicant was asked to evaluate other options to eliminate or reduce the requested variance. <br /> The applicant determined that the addition could not be built closer to the side property line due <br /> to a water problem which Staff has verified. Staff suggests that the addition could be shifted . <br /> farther back onto the rear of the property reducing the variance but the applicant feels this would <br /> not work with the existing interior layout. There is also a possibility that the applicant could <br /> request for the right-of-way to be vacated but this may not be possible if the road is to be <br /> reconstructed to be mpre in line with the utilities in place. <br /> Staff is recommending denial of Planning Case #98-25, front yard setback for the attached family <br /> room and garage (14 feet proposed, when 40 feet is required) based on the "Findings - Front <br /> Yard Setback Variance (family room and garage)" section of the Staffreport dated September <br /> 30, 1998. If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, it would <br /> be heard at the Monday, October 26, 1998, regular meeting of the City Council. <br /> Chair Erickson asked if the existing road is City or County owned. Mr. Ringwald stated the road <br /> in front of the home is owned by the City. <br /> Chair Erickson asked if Staff knows the location of the utilities running between the property line <br /> and the road. Ms. Randall stated normally a road is constructed within approximately 10-15 feet <br /> of the property line and the utilities normally would be under the street or in the right of way. <br /> She noted the road was originally planned to go through this road right-of-way area and it may <br /> be reconstructed in the future because it was built on the park property. <br /> Chair Erickson asked if the houses on the properties to the north and south line up. Ms. Randall <br /> stated they do. . <br /> Commissioner Sand pointed out that the survey map shows the house to the north of the <br /> applicant's property has a garage which extends out beyond the front line of the house. Mr. <br /> Ringwald indicated the structure in question is a concrete slab. <br /> ..-.Y.-'. <br />