Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> DRAFT <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 30, 1998 10 <br /> , <br /> way the City of Arden Hills can pull out of the arrangement and receive any assets back which e <br /> may be due to the City. Mr. Fritsinger pointed out there was only one asset, a half-share of the <br /> ladder truck for which there was currently an agreement with the City of Shoreview. The <br /> agreement explains how the truck was to be paid for and, if one of the cities were to back out of <br /> the agreement, the truck would be offered to the other party to purchase. <br /> Councilmember Larson stated that in previous meetings he had voiced his concern about the term <br /> of the agreement. Part of the reason he was asking these questions is, if the City was embarking <br /> on a 20-year agreement, it should be clear what the City was agreeing to, <br /> Councilmember Larson stated he was still concerned about the term of the agreement. The <br /> previous term had been 10 years and, during the joint meetings when he brought up this concern, <br /> the answer from Shoreview was that they have no interest in taking an interim look at the <br /> agreement. He expressed his appreciation to the City Attorney and Staff for adding some <br /> language which requires the City Council to take some affirmative action to approve <br /> participation in the agreement for another five years. Councilmember Larson indicated he still <br /> feels that 20 years was too long of a term. He stated he supports the idea of a Fire Board, <br /> however, the length of the agreement was not good public policy, For these reasons, he will not <br /> support the agreement as presented. <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski asked how long the City has had a Fire Protection Agreement with <br /> the Fire Department. The LNFD representative stated that the community had been served e <br /> since the founding of the Fire Department in 1943, <br /> Councilmember Aplikowski asked if North Oaks has taken the same position as Shoreview that <br /> they are not interested in a regular review of the agreement. Mr, Fritsinger stated, during the <br /> August meeting, both cities had indicated they approve of the agreement as presented and they <br /> do not have any concerns. <br /> The LJVFD representative stated that, with regard to the review process, the Fire Board was the <br /> on-going review. The Board consists of representatives from the cities and the Fire Department <br /> and this was an on-going communication process between the City Councils, the City's <br /> representatives and the Fire Department. Over the last ten years the there have not been as many <br /> meetings as there should have been and the Fire Department was attempting to make this process <br /> better. <br /> With regard to the long-term contract, the Fire Department was made up of people who are <br /> volunteering to fight fires. The benefit offered was the 20-year pension which was put in place <br /> in order to recruit more volunteers. The Fire Department had recently been able to recruit ten <br /> new people, five of which are day people. This number of day-time volunteers was virtually <br /> unheard of and was due to the 20-year pension. There would be a concern that, if the contract <br /> were only five years long and were to terminate in five years, the volunteers would be left with <br /> no pension. e <br /> Mayor Probst asked if the action for these resolutions would require a simple majority vote. Mr, <br /> Fritsinger stated this was correct. <br /> ------ <br />