Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 30, 1998 DRAFT 12 <br /> , <br /> The LJVFD representative pointed out that, in researching the dissolution clause, it was e <br /> determined that if the Fire Department was not fulfilling its charter as a non-profit organization, <br /> the Department would have to be dissolved by the Court. Councilmember Malone reiterated that <br /> the Fire Department would not be protected if the City stopped payment. <br /> Mayor Probst indicated the Arden Hills Fire Protection Contract does not have to be identical to <br /> the other city's as there are three different cities involved. Mr, Fritsinger concurred and noted <br /> the reserved Section 13 of the agreement allows the individual cities to include separate language <br /> if the other cities do not feel it was appropriate for their contracts. <br /> Mayor Probst reiterated the need for a review of the document to confirm the references to the <br /> "City" and the "Cities of Arden Hills and North Oaks" are corrected, <br /> The motion carried (3-1, Councilmember Larson opposed). <br /> The LJVFD representative expressed his appreciation to Mr. Fritsinger for his involvement in the <br /> negotiations. <br /> B. Resolution #98-72, Rescheduling the Public Hearing in the matter ofthe 1999 Street <br /> Improvement Project, West Round Lake Road <br /> Mr, Fritsinger explained, at the November 9,1998 City Council meeting, the Council adopted e <br /> Resolution #98-63, Receiving the Preliminary Report in the matter of the 1999 Street <br /> Improvement Project, West Round Lake Road (phase II), and scheduled a public hearing on <br /> December 14, 1998 for the proposed improvement. Prior to adoption of this resolution, much <br /> discussion occurred concerning the estimated costs and funding sources of Alternative "B" (two- <br /> lane divided with raised median and turn lanes) and "D" (two-lane undivided with center turn <br /> lane), Specifically, certain members of the Council indicated a desire to see a side-by-side <br /> comparison of Alternatives "B" and "D". In addition, Staffwas asked to provide an update on the <br /> use of tax increment financing (TIF) based proceeds/future TIF revenue streams, <br /> Mr, Fritsinger stated the initial resolution was approved with a 3-2 vote. As the project moves <br /> forward, there was a requirement that any project being considered for assessment be approved <br /> by the Council with a four-fifths vote. The information to be presented should assist the City <br /> Council in determining how the project should proceed, and allow for a more informative public <br /> hearing, <br /> Mr. Fritsinger indicated that City Engineer, Mr. Brown, had provided information which <br /> compares Alternatives "B" and "D" and includes additional information related to Alternative "B" <br /> and the resulting reduction of cost. Mr, Fritsinger indicated that, following Mr, Brown's <br /> presentation, Mr. Post will provide information regarding the revenue sources for the project. <br /> Councilmember Malone suggested referring to Alternatives "B" as the median alternative, and e <br /> "D" as the non-median alternative the simplify the discussions, <br /> Mr, Brown indicated at the November 9, 1998 City Council meeting the question was brought up <br /> regarding the cost of Alternative B. He had stated at that time that the cost had been reduced, <br />