My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 12-14-1998
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCP 12-14-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:04 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 4:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> DRAFT <br /> , <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY cowelL WORKSESSIQN - DI;:!,;;~IlER 7.1998 4 <br /> e <br /> Staff was directed to proceed in conversations with the City of Shoreview on a <br /> shared Building Inspector position for one-year, provided the department revenues <br /> supported such a position, with no general fund levy ramifications. <br /> c. Communily Development Director Position <br /> Mr, Fritsinger provided a report to the City Council on the Parks and Recreation Commission's <br /> review and recommendations regarding the Community Development Director position. <br /> Mr. Fritsinger briefly reviewed and summarized the Commission's comments and discussion <br /> topics. Mayor Probst, Councilmember Keim, and Tracy Petersen, Parks and Recreation Program <br /> Supervisor, had also been in attendance and provided input. <br /> The three options discussed by the Commission, at its December 1, 1998 meeting were: <br /> . Hiring of a full-time Parks & Recreation Director staff position. <br /> . Hiring of a full-time Parks Development/Planner staff position. <br /> . Creation of a joint parks department with a neighboring community. <br /> The Commission recommended that the City hire a full-time Parks and Recreation Director. The e <br /> advantages and disadvantages as identified by the Commission and staff were included in the <br /> staff report and reviewed by the City Council. <br /> Mayor Probst stated he was impressed with the faimess of the Commission in considering the <br /> three options. It was the consensus of those attending that the Commission's main concern was <br /> the public relations and identifY of the City's existing park and trail system. <br /> Discussion items included the current restructuring and the City's overall staffing needs; future <br /> TCAAP potential; current staff absorbing the duties of the Community Development Director; <br /> loss of time needed to train a new Parks Director; combining of parks and public works <br /> maintenance under one supervisor; relationship to budget discussion and salary allocations; <br /> citizen expectations as they relate to City and existing staff needs; lack of interest in a shared <br /> position with the City of Shoreview as a short-term solution; and the "part-time" nature of the <br /> Parks Director position, <br /> Staff was directed to better defme the Parks and Community Development Director positions; <br /> consider other staff responsibilities and other City needs, and proceed with the advertisement for <br /> a Parks and Recreation Director position. <br /> e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.