Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 26, 2026 2 <br />City Administrator Jagoe said this was a carry over from the May 11 work session discussion. At <br />the end of that meeting Staff was asking Council during staff comments if there was interest in <br />doing the temporary work session start times begin at 5:00 pm. Those would be special agendas. <br />The agendas cannot be amended. Staff will try to put as many items on the agenda as we can to <br />ensure we are utilizing that time. She asked Council to discuss and provide next steps. <br />Councilmember Holden said whatever we vote on will be set in stone. We can't change it later so <br />we can amend the agenda. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said if Council were to do a temporary special work session start time <br />of 5:00, the agenda is set and can't be amended. <br />Councilmember Holden said she understands that. If she comes in and says she wants all of her <br />meetings on Monday and something happens and now she wants Tuesday meetings. We can't <br />change that halfway through the year? <br />City Administrator Jagoe said we can. We can either do it temporarily and do special meetings <br />or we can change the ordinance. <br />Councilmember Holden said we can change the ordinance at any time. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said correct. If you change the ordinance those become the regular <br />meeting dates and times. <br />Councilmember Weber said when we had this discussion it was an oversight on his part. He had <br />the assumption that we were shifting the whole schedule ahead a half an hour rather than just the <br />work session. Coming into budget season we can take up the time. As a standing time frame, he <br />would rather see both shift a half an hour. Including moving the Council meetings up. He would <br />prefer a more permanent basis but he doesn't know if just moving the work session up a half an <br />hour does that much for us. It's good for Staff, if we get out of here at a decent time. If the Council <br />meeting is still starting at 7:00 it doesn't really save us anything. It might allow us to get a little <br />more discussion in, if there is a lot of stuff. We have recently worked through a lot of items in our <br />backlog. He would prefer we shift the whole schedule a half an hour. He understands we probably <br />can't do that in this discussion. <br />Councilmember Monson said we did this last summer and the extra half an hour does help, <br />particularly when we get into budget season and get into the depth of things. She would hesitate to <br />move the Council meeting up. One because it eats away at the advantage of giving us that thirty <br />minutes but also because the public has always known the City Council time is 7:00 pm. She is less <br />inclined to change that time. <br />Councilmember Weber gets that. <br />Mayor Grant agrees with the comment that people in town are used to a 7:00 City Council meeting. <br />It is probably best to keep that. That takes us to work session start time which is the item we have <br />in front of us. <br />Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in doing the 5:00 now and just keep that going <br />forward. She thinks those nights when we're here until 10:00 or 11:00 are not ideal. She thinks we <br />