My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
05-26-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2026 1:22:08 PM
Creation date
6/9/2026 1:21:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 26, 2026 6 <br />we have, going forward, before establishing it permanently. She would put it on the list to bring <br />back in August. Or Council can give direction to make that permanent. We could reevaluate the <br />need at the end of August. <br />Mayor Grant said the City Administrator tossed out the possibility of having an extra work session <br />in the middle of the month. That would more than make up for the half hour. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said she did not. There was talk, under 3A, for putting a hold for a <br />special meeting in the fall. <br />Mayor Grant said a special meeting whenever. That special meeting would more than make up <br />the 30 minutes. <br />Councilmember Weber said that special meeting in the fall would be to determine if Council <br />wants to make that permanent? <br />Councilmember Rousseau said no. It would be so we are keeping on track with our road map and <br />if we have any budget issues that we're going to have this year, we can make sure we are on top of <br />the things that we had planned to accomplish this year. <br />Councilmember Weber said okay. He believes the idea was raised to readdress the permanency <br />in the fall. <br />City Administrator Jagoe confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber thinks that's a bad idea just because if Council goes that route, he would <br />prefer that anyone who is unable to make the 5:00 pm start time has plenty of notice, rather than it <br />being unknown until that date. <br />Mayor Grant said he doesn't think the councilmember indicated it was an issue of being known. <br />It's an issue of not being able to attend. <br />Councilmember Weber gets that. <br />Mayor Grant said it's not an issue of being known, it's an issue of not being able to attend. <br />Councilmember Weber clarified that right now, we're being told that someone can't do it. He <br />doesn't want to do that again in August and have this whole discussion again about how <br />inconsiderate of a decision it is, from your perspective. He'd rather establish it now and be done <br />with it. <br />Councilmember Monson agrees with that. <br />Councilmember Rousseau said what she was good with. <br />Mayor Grant said it hasn't changed. He disagrees with that but that's another story. <br />Councilmember Weber asked what he disagrees with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.