My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 05-10-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 05-10-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:11:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cily of Arden Hills <br />April 8, 1999 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we <br />performed tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of <br />our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. We noted no noncompliance with certain <br />provisions of laws, regulations, contract and grants. <br /> <br />Accounting Estimates <br /> <br />Accounting estimates are an integral part of the combined fmancial statements prepared by management and are based on <br />management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain <br />accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general pUrPose financial statements and <br />because of the possibilily that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive <br />estimates affecting the financial statements was depreciation on fixed assets. <br /> <br />Management's estimate of depreciation is based on estimated useful lives ofthe assets. We evaluated the key factors and <br />assumptions used to develop this estimate in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a <br />whole. <br /> <br />Significant Audit Adjustments <br /> <br />For pUrPoses of this letter, professional standards defme a significant audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the general <br />pUrPose fmancial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. We <br />proposed no material audit adjustments. <br /> <br />Disagreements with Management <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards defme a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not <br />resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the <br />general pUrPose fmancial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose <br />during the course of our audit. <br /> <br />Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors <br /> <br />We generally discuss a variely of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with <br />management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of <br />OUT professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. <br /> <br />Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit <br /> <br />We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. <br /> <br />Other Matters <br /> <br />The following are areas that came to our attention during the audit that we feel should be reviewed: <br /> <br />General Fund <br />Actual revenue was greater than budget by $214,605. The total variance represents 8.6% of budget. The area with the <br />greatest variance was nonbusiness licenses and permits with a variance of $162,068. Expenditures were relatively close to <br />budget, finishing $43,483 below a budget of $2,355,180. Total transfers out totaled $302,450 or $119,900 more than budgel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.