Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 28, I 999 lJ~'Q) /' _ <br />"" ~J ~{,; J:.. <br /><6...,.:,' /.-.:.-"',<, <br />accept this option. They would want to put into writing that, if some of their fears for safety due .,~ J''''....... <br />to weaving patterns arise, they would eliminate all local accesses from or onto US Highway 10. . <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked what local accesses Mr. Tolaas was referring to. Mr. Tolaas stated <br />that he was referring to the opening to Scherer Lumber and the Big IOSupper Club, <br />Councilmember Larson noted that these accesses would be closed off with the new proposal. <br />Mr. Tolaas stated that the only access, which would remain, was the access for Scherer Lumber. <br />He noted, however, that the loss of access would be made up by the construction of a frontage <br />road, <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone expressed his belief that the City of Arden Hills is being held to a higher <br />standard by the Minnesota Department of Transportation than other cities. There is pressure <br />being put on the City for long-term vision, which is not being put on other cities, and it appears <br />as though other communities are allowed to follow different rules. <br /> <br />With regard to the spacing of interchanges, Councilmember Malone stated that the high level of <br />traffic, which would be dumped onto Highway 694, with the proposed upgrades, would be too <br />close to Lexington A venue, It seems to him that if it is convenient for the Minnesota Department <br />of Transportation to not pay attention to the rules, it is acceptable. However, Arden Hills is <br />expected to have long-term vision. He expressed his belief that the State should create a super- <br />interchange at I-35W and Highway 694 and leave US Highway 10 as a local access. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he understands the need for vision. He would be less e <br />reluctant if there was a good plan, if the City of Arden Hills was treated the same as other <br />communities and if the Minnesota Department of Transportation were willing to provide a long- <br />term commitment for future construction. He noted that if this issue is not resolved, the <br />Highway 96 improvements may not be accomplished since the turnback funds may not be <br />applied. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that the Arden Hills taxpayers pay a great deal of State Tax and <br />get very little back in return. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson noted that if the new proposal were approved, it would make it difficult for fire <br />trucks to access the Arden Manor Mobile Home Park. <br /> <br />With regard to the maintenance of the frontage road, Mr. Fritsinger asked Mr. Tolaas how the <br />ownership and future maintenance responsibilities of the different configurations would take <br />place. Mr. Tolaas stated that the frontage road would be a municipal access road. <br /> <br />With regard to Councilmember Malone's concerns, Mr. Tolaas stated that he had not intended to <br />suggest that the turn-back funds would not be available for the Highway 96 reconstruction, He <br />indicated that there are certain types of features which the State feels are not meeting the <br />standards. Councilmember Malone stated that when he sees money being spent on projects <br />which are poorly designed, such as WisPark in Shoreview, he feels as though the City of Arden e <br />Hills is being held to a different standard. <br />