Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Draft EIS is required to contain a section related to altematives to the proposal, which it does <br />(Exhibit E). However, the issue related to this section is not whether it includes the required <br />section, but whether other reasonable altematives were explored. Particularly, as this relates to <br />the location ofthe road connection to County Road I (ie., aligning southerly WisPark Road to <br />Schutta Road, rather than a direct connection at the I-35W Interchange). <br /> <br />The Draft EIS is also required to contain a section related to anticipated traffic impacts from the <br />development (Exhibit F), which it does. However, the Draft EIS does not provide for any future <br />traffic levels from TCAAP. As previously mentioned, the City anticipates that 23,700 vehicular <br />trips per day affecting County Road I from the development ofTCAAP. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />The Staff requests direction on the appropriate response to the Draft EIS for the WisPark <br />development in Shoreview. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br />