Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14,1998 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked if all the items in the CIP for 1999 are incorporated into the budget. Mr. <br />Fritsinger stated that is correct. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowsl<i. seconded a <br />motion to adopiResolution #98-77, Adopting the 1999-2003 -Capital <br />Improvement Plan as arnended to include language that the 1999 CIP is adopted <br />to assist with the future financial planning efforts of the City "but is adopted as a <br />general directional plan and its adoption does not confer the automatic purchase of <br />any ofthe items listed in the Plan." <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if the items in 1999 should be exempted since those items are <br />contained within the 1999 budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he would like to keep that open so it can be further discussed. <br />He stated that he does not want to give away the Council's discretion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson noted tlJat the agenda includes adoption of a budget that contains that <br />provision so it seems that the items in 1999 should be exempted. Upon the reading of the <br />motion, Councilmember Larson withdrew his objection. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that it needs to be clear that this adoption does not commit the Council to <br />future purchases. Staff would need to request authorization to go out for bids and the Council <br />would have to approve all of the purchases and contracts. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that should something unforseen happen next year, the Council <br />needs to maintain its discretion over the purchases, including the City Hall funding. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski concurred and noted that is also the thought behind the budget, it is <br />adopted as a plan but the purchases require Council approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that he does not believe this will be a problem with the City's <br />Staff but he supports preserving the Council's discretion. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />C. 1999 Utility Rates <br />1. Resolution #98-78, Revising Water Utility Rates effective January 1,1999 <br />2. Resolution #98-79, Revising Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates effective January 1, <br />1999 <br />3. Resolution #98-80, Revising Surface Water Management (SWM) Utility <br />Rates effective January 1, 1999 <br /> <br />Mr. Post explained that proposed capital outlays are significant over the ensuing years and noted . <br />that the Council last took formal action in fue Fall of 1994 to be effective in 1995 so rates have <br />not changed for four years. During those four years, the revenues generated have been adequate <br />to cover operating costs, fund on-going capital outlays at a predictable level, and improve the <br />financial condition of the enterprise funds. However, some of the demands placed on these <br />