Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14,1998 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated that he had a lengthy discussion with Mr. Post about the sanitary <br />sewer rates and understands that there is no way to meter sewage but it is known that rate is <br />related to water use. He stated that it seems to him that it would be worthwhile to have the <br />Finlll1ce _Committee review this issutl. and provide recommendations for the Council to consider <br />next year. Councilmember Larson stated that there is currently a flat rate and some residents <br />may be subsidizing other residents. He acknowledged the issue where water use in the summer <br />months may not be water going into the sanitary sewer system due to pools, lawn sprinkling, etc. <br />and during the winter months residents may be away from home, including seniors. He <br />suggested that water consumption over a nine month period be addressed to determine average <br />consumption. Councijmember Larson suggested that all rates be addressed to bring them closer <br />into what the consumption may actually be. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Keirn stated her concern if the decision is delayed since it should go into effect <br />on January 1, 1999. She stated that there is nothing that could be said to change her mind since <br />the determination is based on costs and the recommendation on the senior rate increase is on a <br />step basis with the full rate not occurring for three years. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that not all public agencies operate the same way and he knows some <br />councils have to publish items on at least one agenda before the issue is acted on. He stated that <br />Arden Hills does not do that and while he is not suggesting such a process, he believes there <br />should be some notification to residents and an opportunity provided for them to provide <br />comments. He stated that he does have an interest in a discussion on what the process should be _ <br />to modifY such a significant policy. ... <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski asked ifit is being suggested to phase the senior rate increase in <br />2000 instead of 1999. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that rather than looking at the beginning of the first quarter it would start the <br />beginning of the second quarter which would allow residents to be notified that the rates are <br />being considered. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked if this is being suggested for all the rates or just the senior rate. <br />He stated that in fue past the Council determined to review rates each year to allow for smaller <br />increases. He noted that delaying this to the second quarter results in the loss of 25% of the <br />revenue increase. Councilmember Malone suggested that the rate increases be considered <br />tonight and asked if anyone is expected to testify in support of the senior rate increase. He noted <br />that this involves one dollar per month and there is good rationale for this increase to base the <br />rate on usage and eliminate the subsidy that is being paid. Councilmember Malone stated that <br />the senior rate could be delayed but he wonders if anyone will change their mind based on input <br />that could be provided. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that in the past the argument has been raised about the incentive to conserve <br />when paying on a consumption basis as opposed to a fixed rate. He stated that he would not <br />oppose relooking at this option since it has been four years and the City now has different billing e <br />software. <br />