Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS EDA SPECIAL MEETING - JANUARY 4,1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />funding gaps which need to be filled. There are two options to fill these gaps. The first would be a <br />borrowing approximately $972,367.60 from the PIR Fund, which would be paid back by the ., <br />Ramsey County funds, with interest. Secondly, the City had pledged $1,600,000.00 through the <br />TIF Bond Fund. These two options would provide the $2,572,367.60 needed to complete the <br />project. <br /> <br />The City has discussed the concept of funding the cost of the land over time with the <br />Indykiewicz family. Under this scenario, the City could spread the purchase of the property over <br />three years and pay an interest rate of 8% on the outstanding balance. The additional cost to <br />finance this option would be approximately $120,000.00. Staff would prefer the up front funding <br />in order to minimize the interest costs. <br /> <br />In speaking with Ramsey County, it is their belief that the project funds would start to be <br />available in the Spring of 1999. At this time it is not clear whether this would be all or a portion <br />of the funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald advised that Staff is recommending the EDA authorize Staff to hire a consultant to <br />conduct a Phase I environmental analysis of the property. Authorize the City Attorney to prepare <br />a purchase agreement for the entire Indykiewicz parcel at 1920 Highway 96, for a price not to <br />exceed $1,150,000.00, excluding dirt and fixtures, subject to the following: <br /> <br />I. Stable soils and no environmental contamination. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Approval of the purchase agreement by the EDA. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />President Probst stated that he is prepared to support the fact that the City would be paying a <br />premium for the parcel. However, he is concerned whether there is still the potential for the <br />project to fall through if the City and the property owners cannot agree on the value of the <br />fixtures and dirt. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that it is his understanding that the property owner is willing to move <br />forward with the sale of the property and, in the mean time, come to a resolution on the fixtures <br />and dirt. Mr. Ringwald indicated that he has reviewed the property owner's appraisal of the <br />fixtures and he believes they are close to being appropriate. There are some questions regarding <br />the dirt, not only the proposed cost, but also with the amount of dirt on the property. The <br />property owner is estimating the amount of dirt to be approximately 35,000 yards. This amount <br />could be verified through surveying or trucking out of the dirt. <br /> <br />President Probst confirmed that, fundamentally, the property owners are looking to walk away <br />from the property and the fixtures and dirt would be the City's responsibility. Mr. Ringwald <br />concurred. He noted one concern the property owner had expressed was the safety and security <br />of the equipment of the property. The property owner prefers that the equipment be the <br />responsibility of the City. <br /> <br />. <br />