Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY Co{ JNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 11. 1999 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Other items of discussion included, potential loss of City revenue; Shoreview tower farm <br />capacity; Arden Hills residents' access to Channel 29; existing towers within fue City (Vaughan <br />site and MnDOT); pending assessments; future property uses for school expansion if the <br />MnDOT site consolidated with the Fox 29 tower; strobe light concerns; potential consultant <br />needs for research; aesthetics; proximity to trails; insurance liability rarnifications; and other <br />strategies. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger advised Councilmembers that the firm was targeting the March Planning <br />Commission meeting for submittal of their application, and that the City appeared to have two <br />options; location of the tower on the TCAAP site or the Vaughan property. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to continue working with City Attorney Filla on investigating the proposed <br />tower and site, and provide a recommendation to the Council on available options as soon as <br />possible and various rarnifications of those options. Staff was also directed to prepare a press <br />release regarding this proposal. <br /> <br />b. West Round Lake Road. Phase II Alternates <br /> <br />The City Council had previously discussed the design of the Phase II West Round Lake Road <br />project. At that time, the Council had voted against a project that included full medians, but . <br />expressed an interest in other options. Greg Brown, Consulting Engineer and GralJam Sones, <br />Landscape Architect, from BRW, Inc. were in attendance to present four alternates for further <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown reviewed the four alternates, their associated costs and arnenities, and clarified <br />various questions and comments of the Council. The four options considered were: <br /> <br />. Forty-four (44) foot roadway with 12 foot median and 16 foot lanes <br />. Fifty (50) foot roadway with 18 foot median and 16 foot lanes <br />. Forty-four (44) foot roadway with flush, decorative paved median and 16 foot <br />lanes <br />. Forty-four (44) foot roadway with no median (center lane) and 16 foot lanes <br /> <br />Mr. Brown and Mr. Fritsinger clarified that the cost estimates did not include landscaping, top <br />soil, lighting, irrigation, or trees and shrubs; only the infrastructure costs were provided. Cost <br />estimates for the landscaping (plant materials only) were $5,000 per median for a minimal <br />approach, or $26 - 30,000 for the entire project. <br /> <br />Further discussion included lighting options; estimated cost of cold in place recycling; pending <br />assessments and funding availability; overhead power lines; freeway location; character of entire <br />roadway; and its affect on the rest of the development. <br /> <br />. <br />