CCP 01-25-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e It e , fair market value of tlJe home, tlJen would contact potential buyers after she had an appraisal. She indicated that the process would take approximately one month. 16.) On September 2, 1998, tlJe City sent anotlJer letter acknowledging her getting an appraisal, but, due to the arnount oftime already spent on removing the rubbish and debris, she would need to expedite the process as quickly as possible. Staff suggested her contacting potential buyers and determining tlJeir interest so she could sell the property as quickly as possible after getting her appraisal. 17.) In October of 1998, Ms. Teslow informed Staff that she had indeed sold tlJe property but that some details had yet to be worked out. She indicated tlJat by tlJe end of October she would have everything finalized. Staff asked if she had informed the new buyer of her dealings witlJ tlJe City. She indicated that she had and stated tlJat she had given tlJe buyer tlJe list of items required by the City to bring the house into compliance with City Code. 18.) On November 17, 1998, after receiving no notice of who the new buyer was, or a timetable for the homes completion, Staff called Ms. Teslow. She informed Staff that the new buyer oftlJe home was Brice Scott (3375 Lake Johanna Boulevard), but that the paperwork had still not been completed to finalize tlJe sale. The City contacted Mr. Scott to confirm that he was indeed tlJe new buyer and was in the process offmalizing the paperwork on tlJe purchase of1875 Lake ):.ane. Mr. Scott confirmed he was tlJe buyer and would have all details worked out by the end of tlJe month. 19.) On November 19, 1998, Ms. Teslow was given a final date of November 30, 1998, for the sale to be completed and plans submitted outlining the work to be done to bring the home into compliance. The plans were also to indicate a reasonable timetable when the home would be completed. Staff received no plans or signed deed indicating the property had been sold. Staff then directed the City Attorney to preparing a Findings and Order and to begin the abatement process for 1875 Lake Lane. 20.) In December of 1998, City Attorney John Miller sent Ms. Teslow a letter stating that it was the intention of the City to begin the abatement process. 21.) On December 31,1998, the City received a signed Contract for Deed between Ms. Teslow and Brice Scott. 22.) On January 4,1999, Staff informed Mr. Scott by telephone tlJat plans for the repair of the home still had not been submitted. 23.) On January 4, 1999, tlJe City received, by facsimile, a brief outline of what was to be done. Staff again informed Mr. Scott, by letter on January 7, 1999, that tlJe plans did not go into enough detail, did not include information required, and that the timetable for completion was much too long. New plans indicating the extent of the work to be done, WIth a timetable for its completion by May 1,1999, need to be submitted no later than January 15, 1999. 24.) As of January 22, 1999, no adequate plans had been submitted.