Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 3, 1999 <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald noted that, if an applicant wishes to change the Official Map, this change must be <br />accomplished first, as the City Council has given clear direction of what they want. The Council <br />can change its mind. However, until it does, there is an Official Map, which must be adhered to. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson asked if the Official Map is part of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Ringwald <br />stated that it is. He indicated that the Official Map is laid out in the Transportation Element of <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson requested confirmation that all homeowners who would be affected by a change <br />in the Official Map would be notified. Mr. Ringwald stated that all of the affected property <br />owners have been involved with this issue since 1992. He indicated that if a petitioner presents a <br />plat, which depicts a cul-de-sac, the Staff would inform them that they could not recommend <br />approval of it because it does not conform to the Official Map. The only alignment, which Staff <br />could recommend approval of, is the through street alignment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked if the road currently runs through the property to the north at this <br />time. Mr. Ringwald explained that it does not. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson noted that, although most of the neighbors di4 not want the street to be brought <br />through, the City had decided it would make more sense from an alignment point of view. <br />Commissioner Sand noted that there had also been some turn around issues for large vehicles as <br />well. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson asked what the procedure would be to change the Official Map. Mr. Ringwald <br />stated that the applicant would make a request to the City, similar to a rezoning request. If the <br />change were approved, the plat proposal would then be processed. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson pointed out that the petitioner already had a plan depicting a cul-de-sac. Mr. <br />Ringwald agreed and noted that the proposal would require two cul-de-sacs be constructed on <br />either side. <br /> <br />Chair Erickson asked if the property was large enough for a Planned Unit Development. <br />Commissioner Baker pointed out that a Planned Unit Development would open the door to the <br />maximum amount of development allowable. He noted however, that the topography of the land <br />would limit the development to some extent. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if the cul-de-sac being proposed by the developer is large enough. <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that the 50-foot radius would not be sufficient as presented. Commissioner <br />Sand asked what the minimum radius would be. Mr. Ringwald explained that it would be <br />approximately 60 feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson asked, if the road were aligned as the City had original planned, how <br />would the road be brought through the property. Mr. Ringwald explained the City would either <br />use its eminent domain authority or the applicant could offer to buy the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if the City had allowed any new lots that did not meet the minimum <br />requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Ringwald stated that they have in some instances. <br />What will fit into the neighborhood is considered and most of the surrounding lots are deficient. <br />