Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills includes a significant system of interconnected natural water bodies and <br />a manmade drainage infrastructure system consisting of ditches, ponds, storm sewer piping and <br />culverts. The field review of these systems indicated that very few significant problem areas <br />exist within the City that need immediate attention. There was no indication of property <br />(structure) damage occurring as a result of substandard drainage infrastructure in the City. Two <br />nuisance problem areas were identified by residents living along McClung Drive and Siems <br />Court and potential mitigation measures have been suggested and estimated for these two <br />instances. <br /> <br />The majority of items encountered in the survey are minor in nature and could be accomplished <br />over time by City forces or grouped into bid packages to be let to contractors or added to larger <br />public works contracts such as future street reconstruction programs. The City has budgeted <br />$50,0000.00 for drainage improvement work for the fiscal years 1999 and 2000 with an annual <br />budget of $25,000.00 per year beginning in fiscal year 2001. Based upon our survey, the City <br />Engineer feels that this budget will be adequate to address the problem areas identified in this <br />report within the next five years while providing for future repairs and maintenance which will <br />be needed on the system. The funding may be better appropriated on a biannual basis which <br />would allow for greater economy of scale in assembling work packages to be let ($50,000.00 per <br />biennium). <br /> <br />The report also considered possible regional pond sites throughout the City. The intent of <br />identifYing the pond sites at this time is to include them as considerations when reconstructing <br />streets and storm sewers in the future. Some pond sites are more independent than others <br />relative to when they could be constructed. Some of the ponds shown are only possible to build <br />by utilizing a portion of existing wetland areas or by acquiring private property. The Rice Creek <br />watershed has allowed the construction of storm water ponds with some wetland impacts in the <br />past under the philosophy that the water quality improvements realized through the storm water <br />pond outweigh the wetland area "sacrificed". The Council should consider whether a portion of <br />the City Storm Water Utility should be budgeted for potential future storm water regional pond <br />construction. The City Engineer also recommends that the City collect additional water quality <br />data in existing lakes and major wetlands and streams for prioritizing of water quality ponding <br />improvements. <br /> <br />11 <br />