Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN IllLLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />March 11, 1999 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator <br />Terrance Post, City Accountant @ <br /> <br />Community Services Fund Discussion FoUow-up <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Background <br />At the regular City Council meeting of March 8,1999, the subject of the Community Services <br />Fund No. 225 was generally discussed as a new business agenda item. <br /> <br />An outcome of the discussion was to give staff specific direction on reporting Community <br />Services Fund No. 225 December 31, 1998 fund balance future uses (Le., 58% Parks and 42% <br />Fire). Council also raised questions concerning (1) if Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.12, Subd. <br />25 was the relevant statutory cite to define allowable City "lawful purpose" expenditures from a <br />10% contribution fund; and (2) how could the 1999 budgeted $200,000 revenue source from the <br />Community Services Fund for TCAAP implementation planning be replaced. <br /> <br />Statutorv "Lawful PUlpose" E~enditures for Cities <br />Confusion occurred at the Council meeting when the Oambling Control Board Form L051 0 <br />instructions "A-lO - expenditures for services, equipment and training" was compared to <br />Miunesota Statutes, Section 349.12, Subd. 25 (10), "a contribution to the United States, this state <br />or any of its political subdivisions, and any agency or instrumentality thereof other than a direct <br />contribution to a law enforcement or prosecutorial agency," and found not to be consistent. <br /> <br />The explanation lies in reviewing Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.213, Subd. I (a), ".....the ten <br />percent fund .... for disbursement by the responsible local unit of govemment of the receipts for <br />(i) lawful purposes, or (ii) police, fire, and other emergency or public safety-related services, <br />equipment, and training, excluding pension obligations, is not considered an expenditure to the <br />City or County, nor a tax under Section 297E.02, and is valid and lawful." This addition to <br />"lawful purposes" was legislatively added in the 1998 session. The upshot is that "lawful <br />purposes" are the same for both organizations and cities with the sole exception being the <br />"police, fire, emergency" available for cities but not organizations. Also the Gambling Control <br />Board instruction form -does not give the correct cite for "A-IO." <br />