Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tit <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - MARCH 15, 1999 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Discussion items included future roadway design; estimated construction costs based on a typical <br />thirty-two (32) foot road ($1.8 million); assessment issues along New Brighton Road, or Lake <br />Johanna Boulevard; advantages and disadvantages to the City accepting the turnback; road <br />ratings; the proposed turnbacks as they relate to leveraging funding for the West Round Lake <br />Road and Highway 96 construction projects (the Indykiewicz parcel); <br /> <br />Staff was directed to proceed with further conversations with Ramsey County regarding the <br />status of funding for the Indykiewicz parcel and whether this could accelerate payment for this <br />project, should the City agree to take back Lake Johanna Boulevard at this time. <br /> <br />d. Indvkiewicz Pronertv. Uses of Remnant Parcel <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald requested Council direction on the types of uses it would find acceptable for the <br />remnant Indykiewicz parcels in order to facilitate future marketing efforts. Mr. Ringwald stated <br />the parcels were 3.3 acres and.4 of an acre on Round Lake Road. Mr. Ringwald further advised <br />that this was a preliminary request, as Forest Lake Construction would be using the site until the <br />end of the year for construction of Phase 1 of West Round Lake Road, and the MnDOTturnback <br />was pending. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald advised of three major site constraints consisting of, utility lines; access - right- <br />in, right-out; and on-site ponding. The site had been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as <br />one-third business use, but no detailed description of intended uses had been pursued. <br /> <br />Alternate ways to view the redevelopment potential were discussed, including maximum return <br />on investment; providing a site for a use that is needed by the community; providing a site for a <br />use needed by the Gateway Business District; and the possible purchase of Parcel D (ponding <br />area) by the Nott Company to expand their building to the north; recoup of costs for purchase <br />and paydown of the bonds; and potential interest from Ramsey County in sharing in proceeds of <br />the property sale for right-of-way areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Post stated that the tax increment fmancing (TIF) district would expire in the year 2015, and <br />this should provide a sense of urgency to market the property at the earliest possible date. <br /> <br />e. Community Services Fund Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Post reviewed several items for clarification as a follow up to the last regular Council <br />meeting regarding the Community Services Fund. <br /> <br />Policy considerations and discussion included the flexibility of the policy on an annual basis, or <br />as needed; past budget practices and expenditures; General Fund dependency as it relates to the <br />Community Services Fund as a revenue source; and future expenditures frorn the fund. <br />Staff was directed to proceed with uses of the Community Services Fund as discussed, primarily <br />in the recreation, park capital, and fire capital areas. <br />