Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A Good Bond Referendum <br />Designed by the Community and the Schools <br />Summary of the process <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Objective, independent, <br />professional facilities <br />inspection <br /> <br />Parent and Community <br />involvement <br /> <br />Parent and Community <br />oversight and <br />recommendations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The process is a Community <br />working together <br />Building Committees <br />District Facility Task Force <br />Athletic Facility Task Force <br />Indoor Air Quality Committee <br />Decision Resources Survey <br />School Board <br /> <br />More Parent and Community <br />involvement <br /> <br />Unanimous School Board <br />support <br /> <br />Wold Architects inspected individual Mounds View buildings for <br />themselves in 1996 and returned in 1997. They subcontracted <br />engineering firms for some of the most specialized assessments. <br />Wold recommended $100+ million in facility improvements and <br />upgrades. <br /> <br />Building Committecs were created at individual schools, <br />composed of parents, teachers, and building administrators. The <br />committees reported their priorities directly to Wold Architects. <br /> <br />In September, 1998, a district-wide Facility Task Force <br />composed of parents and community representatives, a teacher's <br />representative, building and district administrators was formed. A <br />separate Athletic Facility Task Force composed of district <br />representatives, youth athletic associations, and five city parks and <br />recreation departments that use district athletic facilities had <br />previously assessed current facilities and future requirements. They <br />considered both school-based facilities and community-based <br />athletic facilities.. In May of 1998, the District-wide Indoor Air <br />Quality Committee, composed of community representatives, <br />school nurses, building maintenance and administrators, and staff, <br />submitted a master plan for indoor air quality. <br /> <br />The Facility Task Force studied the Wold recommendations, and <br />those of the Building Committees. They reviewed the assessments <br />of the Athletic Facility Task Force, and the Indoor Air Quality <br />Committee Master Plan. They considered the survey results from <br />Decision Resources (see below).The result was the Facility Task <br />Force Master Plan, January 7,1999, submitted with unanimous <br />support from the Task Force. <br /> <br />Decision Resources, Fall, 1998, conducted a survey of district <br />residents to provide a broad assessment of residents' concerns, <br />asking which improvements they supported most strongly and how <br />much they felt they could afford. <br /> <br />On January 26, 1999, the school board unanimously approved an <br />$80 million bond referendum. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The result of a thorough, fair, and open process is <br />a good Bond Referendum that deserves our support. <br />Vote "Ves" on May 25. <br /> <br />Prepared and paid for by the Vote Yes Committee <br />Terry Quigley, Treasurer <br />P. O.Box 120952. NewBrightQI'!.MN 55112 <br />