My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-29-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 03-29-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:20 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />David and Dianne Rushenberg <br />3168 Shoreline Lane <br />Arden Hills, MN 55112 <br />651-483-1261 <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />FEB 0 3 1999 <br />OlYOf4R~ r:fU:' <br /> <br />Planning Commision Members <br />Arden Hills, MN <br /> <br />Dear Planning Commision Members: <br /> <br />I'm writing to voice my concerns with the various proposals concerning the property <br />adjoining the north side of our property at 3168 Shoreline Lane, Arden Hills. In the past, <br />the council has not listened closely to the neighborhood's concerns about the extension of <br />Shoreline Lane. Several years ago the village's planning committee took on the task of <br />plotting the extension ofSboreline Lane, and told us in the neighborhood, "No, we're not <br />planning on putting the road through, we just need to plat it on the map." Now, we have <br />the urgency on the village's part to extend the road for the well being of a developer, not <br />necessarily the neighborhood Are we listening and looking at all the various options <br />available? <br /> <br />Mr. Bill Bachman was assured this past fall by the city's mllnlle;er, that when Bill gave <br />approval for the fire hydrant to be installed at the northern boundary ofhis property that <br />Shoreline was not going to be extended. Where is that assurance tonight? <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />This is a muhi-level problem; trust in our government has to start somewhere. Let's start <br />here with listening to our concerns and seeking a fuir solution. Not "police powers" as <br />stated in the letter dated 01108/99 to Mr. Frank Reskuski. Except for one casual <br />conversation with Mr. Reskuski last full that I initiated, we have not heard from these <br />developers. Mr. Don Evertz had said in a conversation last fall that when they had <br />something on paper they would be sharing it with us. We have not heard from either Mr, <br />Reskuski or Mr. Evertz on current plans, we haven't heard from either of them at all. I <br />would be interested to hear what information they have pertaining to their effurts in <br />obtllining access from the neighbors to the South. Since we've not been contacted, what <br />efforts have they made? Are they planning to seek our input, doesn't appear to be <br />important to them. <br /> <br />Because ofa family emergency, we may be unable to attend the Planning Commissions <br />meeting, but please be advised, we are VERY interested in having our input registered <br />and we feel that the developers have not been open and above board with sharing <br />information with us regarding the property. <br /> <br />;([:~ <br /> <br />David and Dianne Rushenberg <br />e CC: Arden Hills Village Council <br /> <br /> <br />sItS <br /> <br />..'i~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.