CCP 05-24-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT 3 ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7,1999 . 2. 3. Extension of Shoreline Lane through the subject property be deeded to the City. Provide staff with proposed grading and sediment and erosion control measures that are to be used on this project for staff approval. Ms. Randall stated that staff had received submittals related to this information and is in the process of reviewing it. 4. Payment of appropriate Park Dedication, as determined by the City Council, as provided for by the Subdivision Ordinance ofthe City Code. S. Payment of an Escrow for future extension of Shoreline Lane to the north property line. 6. Approval by Rice Creek Watershed District. 7. Basement elevations not be below 887.8 feet. 8. Utility and drainage easements be provided per the Subdivision Ordinance ofthe City Code. Ms. Randall stated that these easements were provided on the updated plan. . 9. Construction specifications for street and utilities be submitted with the final plat submittal. 10. Easements in a form acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney be granted to the City for temporary cul-de-sac, and the documents be submitted with the final plat application. 11. Right-of-way from the south property be acquired prior to final plat approval for access to the property. 12. Outstanding fee for attorney fees in the amount of$1,118.80 be paid in full prior to final . plat approval. If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, then it would be heard at the May 24, 1999, regular meeting of the City Council. Mr. Don Evertz, 1442 Arden Oaks Drive, stated that he would like to have this Planning Case moved on to the City Council as it has taken six to seven months to get to this point in the process. The intent is to work out a situation, which works for the City, the neighborhood and the developer. Mr. Evertz stated that he had objections to some of the conditions for approval. He indicated that he would work with the City Council in resolving these objections. Chair Erickson asked what the objections to the conditions were. Mr. Evertz stated that one objection is the payment of escrow for the future extension of Shoreline Lane to the north property line. The other is the outstanding attorney fees. He explained that he had just received the break down ofthe outstanding fees for the attorney's work and these numbers have not been verified with his attorney. There is a $20,000 performance bond, which the City has held back the $1,118.80 needed to pay the outstanding attorney fees. . With regard to acquiring the right-of-way from the southern property owners, Mr. Evertz indicated that the City must have known how this would be accomplished when the Master Plan was created. He suggested that stafflook into how this had originally been planned.