Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION -MAY 17, 1999 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Cable Casting/ITV Svstem <br />Specifications call for a two camera system. The design consultants stated that this was a <br />basic system, and that the elimination of many graphics and other amenities had been <br />completed when reductions had first been requested in the original proposal and budget. <br />Discussion included various options of removing cablecast capabilities altogether; <br />available cable dollars for that purpose; incorporation of existing equipment in the new <br />facility; and current and future expectations of residents for a quality system in the new <br />facility. <br /> <br />Control Svstem <br />Discussion related to the actual location of the control panel and contrast between a <br />wireless or hard wired system. It was the consensus of the Council that the design <br />consultants proceed with the hard wired system. <br /> <br />Related overall project discussion included whether the City wanted to increase future cable casts <br />to include the Planning Commission meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger asked for specific direction from those Councilmembers present regarding their <br />support ofthe current budget and program as outlined and refined in the Electronic Media <br />Technology Budget Description dated May 10, 1999, as prepared by Electronic Interiors, Inc. <br /> <br />After extensive review and discussion, Mayor Probst and Councilmembers Aplikowski and Rem <br />were supportive, with reservations, of those elements as presented by the design consultants and <br />staff, at an estimated system total of$119,210. Councilmember Larson expressed his concern <br />regarding the necessity for installation of the rear-projection screen and amenities at this time, <br />provided the infrastructure was included in the initial design. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger sought further Council direction as staff was attempting to put the finishing <br />touches on the overall City Hall design program, and the audio/visual component affected the <br />design timing and status of the overall project. Mr, Fritsinger stated that staff and the design <br />consultants were seeking direction from the Council on whether or not to proceed with the design <br />as laid out by the consultants, and the projected costs, or whether redesign of the Council <br />Chambers and the ultimate redesign of the audio/visual component would be necessary. <br /> <br />With the absence of Councilmember Malone at this meeting, and the uncertainty of how the <br />overall City Hall project would or would not proceed depending on the timing of the land <br />transfer process, it was the consensus of those Councilmembers present that staff be directed to <br />bring this component of the City Hall project back to the Council at the May 24,1999 meeting or <br />future meeting, for a formal decision on whether to proceed with the $120,000 audio/visual <br />package as presented, depending upon the status of the overall project. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that the projected addition of a third camera at an estimated <br />additional cost of $11,780; and the addition of a bulletin board system for cable audience at an <br />estimated additional cost of $5,553 were not necessary at this time, provided the infrastructure <br />capabilities were included in the original design. <br />