My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-14-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 06-14-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:26 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:19:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 24, 1999 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />to the client. He added they do not pre screen and it makes no difference to them which <br />community the client prefers. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked what impact the I-35W corridor will have on prospective development in the <br />City. Mr. Piggott stated the Partnership is able to obtain real estate information from a database <br />of commercial sites, and the best response material is coming from that coalition. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst asked for clarification of the term "investor" which is used in the Partnership's <br />strategic plan, Mr. Piggott stated the Partnership's members are considered investors as it <br />attempts to provide a return on investment for all members. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked what the City's contribution was to the organization. Mr. Piggott <br />stated the City's fee of$500 is not pro-rated and there is no minimum level for communities. He <br />added that the fee is based upon available development opportunities. <br /> <br />C. Plannine Cases <br /> <br />1. Case #99-07, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (Guidant), 4100 Hamline Avenue N, PUD <br />(Master Plan) <br /> <br />Ms, Randall explained that the applicant is proposing to update their master plan to include a <br />recent addition between building A and B, a future proposed addition to building B, an addition <br />to building E, and future parking lots to the north and east. She added the applicant proposes to . <br />reduce their current available parking to allow for the building of the addition to Building E, and <br />provide 221 additional parking spaces on the east side of Fernwood Avenue. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall noted that staff is concerned that parking across F ernwood A venue, which is not <br />connected to the site, will create pedestrian crossing problems and issues, and the property could <br />be sold in the future thus reducing the amount of employee parking. She added that staff <br />recommends that an easement be placed to this site or that the area to the north of Building E be <br />added as proof of parking if the site across Femwood Avenue were lost or sold. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall stated staff also recommends a sidewalk to the entrance of the building be <br />constructed for pedestrians crossing F ernwood A venue, and that the City install a stop sign so <br />that traffic will stop in all directions. She noted that all buildings meet the required setbacks, <br />except for building H which would no longer be an issue if the property to the north of Building <br />E is combined with the main campus. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall stated the City Engineer had noted a possible trail easement along County Road F, <br />adding the timing of this trail is still uncertain and staff does not recommend moving forward <br />with that issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Randall stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this case, with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.