Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JULY 19, 1999 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />the type of development; and the need for high-capacity access to Hwy.1 O. Mr. Brown <br />emphasized that the importance, from MnDOT's perspective, is basically safety and a plan that <br />provides an opportunity to eliminate any of those major safety issues. Mr. Brown stated that, <br />MnDOT was favorable of the minimal projected cost increments to make these safety revisions <br />at this time. Mr. Brown stated that a grade separation focuses more traffic to the 1-35W <br />intersection; and assists with pedestrian and bicycle traffic safety issues; and future TCAAP <br />development. Councilmember Malone reminded Councilmembers, County and MnDOT <br />representatives that grade separation was suggested by the City Council at the early stage, as <br />early as 1994. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst expressed his concern that Ramsey County is apparently forcing the City to make <br />a decision, and then requiring the City to handle the right-of-way acquisition costs, in spite of the <br />City having already advance-funded the costs for the West Round Lake Road intersection project <br />in its entirety. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated that MnDOT seemed to lack a consensus among its <br />representatives on the merits of any specific safety issue, with the City observing them <br />fluctuating from one point to another. Mr. Malone emphasized that he felt the City should <br />expect no less than a written agreement with MnDOT and Ramsey County regarding their <br />transportation plans or intentions as TCAAP develops. Mr. Malone expressed his perception of a <br />lack of credibility with MNDOT, given the City's experience with the agency on this project. <br /> <br />At this point, Councilmembers and staff reviewed several options for a more regional <br />transportation plan with various alternatives and the projected development timetable of the area. <br /> <br />Each Councilmember expressed their ideas and concerns, with the general consensus being that <br />of meeting the City's specific needs and ultimate costs in access and money to the City, while <br />recognizing and incorporating those of the entire transportation area. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that regarding overall funding, MnDOT would stand behind core <br />improvements with additional paybacks dependent on justification, at which point splits would <br />be assigned. Other than that, he could provide no funding guarantees. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst reviewed the apparent two options available to the City, a short-term or a long- <br />term solution, or tabling the entire project for up to five years. <br /> <br />Mr. Fritsinger stated that, even if the Army should decide against the excessing of the TCAAP <br />property, its probable Federal reuse would also have an impact on future traffic. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski expressed her concerns regarding the displacement of residents and <br />them not remaining in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald suggested that an overall regional transportation plan be developed that involved <br />the State of Minnesota and it's various agencies, including MnDOT, Metropolitan Council, and <br />