My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-09-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 08-09-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:34 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1 Response: The Legislature should establish and fund reforestation for cities in <br />2 federally declared disaster areas that have lost trees due to the 1998 storms. The <br />3 reforestation program should be modeled after the program set forth in Minnesota <br />4 Statutes, Chapter 18.023 for Dutch elm disease and oak wilt. The program should <br />5 provide for direct grants to cities, and not establish a reimbursement program. H <br />6 necessary, the program should allow for in-kind contributions to count if the state <br />7 requires a matching program. <br />8 <br />9 SD-19. Board of Firefighter Training (ew) <br />10 [maintain current policy] <br />II <br />12 Issue: The quality,ay;ulability, and affordability of firefighter training varies greatly <br />13 across the state. After several years of discussion, the fire service has endorsed a <br />}4- proposal to create a state board -of firefighter training to ensure the quality of training and <br />15 oversee state reimbursement of a portion of training costs. The board would not be given <br />16 authority to mandate specific training requirements or to certify firefighters. <br />17 <br />18 Response: The League supports the fire service proposal as long as local <br />19 governments are fairly represented on the board; the powers and duties of the <br />20 board are not expanded in a way that would undermine local management <br />21 authority; and the appropriation comes from the state general fund. <br />22 <br />23 SD-20. Witness Fees (as) <br />24 [maintain current policy] <br />25 <br />26 Issue: Court administrators are proposing that the Legislature shift the costs <br />27 attributable to calling witnesses from counties to cities. The rationale behind this <br />28 proposal is that city prosecutors have no incentive to limit the witnesses called only to <br />29 those that will actually testify. Most counties currently receive one-third of the fines <br />30 collected at the city level. <br />31 <br />32 Response: Cities oppose the shifting of costs attributable to calling witnesses <br />33 from counties to cities. City prosecutors responsibly call only those witnesses they <br />34 expect to testify. Under certain circumstances, witnesses may' not ultimately provide <br />35 testimony for a variety of reasons. The fine revenue counties receive adequately <br />36 funds the costs attributable to calling witnesses. <br />37 <br /> <br />38 SD-21. State Appropriation for Government Training Service (GTS) <br />39 [ eliminate policy] <br />40 Issue: In 1977, the Government Training Service was created in order to provide a <br />41 coordinated response to the training needs of state and local governments. GTS was <br />42 charged with coordinating the needs of the state, cities, counties, townships, and school <br />43 districts, with the delivery capability ofthe state's institutions of higher learning and <br />44 other continuing education service providers. <br />45 <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.