My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-09-1999
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCP 08-09-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:15:34 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 11:23:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 12, 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone confirmed that West Round Lake Road would be downhill. Mr. Brown <br />stated that West Round Lake Road would go downhill slightly. The high point will be e <br />approximately the center of the Nott Company, with drainage north to the retention pond. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Pay Estimate #3 for Forest Lake Contracting, Inc. of Forest <br />Lake, Minnesota in the amount of$271,719.87. The motion carried unanimously <br />(5-0). <br /> <br />B. Pay Estimate #3, Final Pay Estimate, Jay Brothers <br /> <br />Mr. Brown explained that Pay Estimate #3 represents the final payment for the Lift Station <br />Number Three Reconstruction Project. The majority of this project had been complete last <br />winter and there were a few minor clean-up items that had to wait until this spring and summer. <br />These included site grading and the laying of class-5 material for access to the site for City <br />maintenance. The final payment represents the release of all withheld retainage <br />Mr. Brown advised that the Arden Hills City Engineer recommended the Council approve Pay <br />Estimate #3 for Jay Brothers, Inc. of Forest Lake, Minnesota in the amount of $7,507.34 <br />Mayor Probst asked Mr. Stafford if he was happy with the outcome of this project. Mr. Stafford <br />stated that the Lift Station had been up and running for five months. He noted that there had <br />been some minor grading work that was held until spring to allow for any soil settling which may <br />occur. He added that the new Lift Station was a major improvement to the City sanitary sewer <br />system. e <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted that-the-road appears to run along the propwy-line-ofthe site. He lIEk-ed if <br />there was an easement for the road. Mr. Stafford stated that there is an easement in this area for <br />the sewer line that runs to the south and follows the shoreline between the homes on Siems Court <br />and the shoreline. Property owners do use this easement at times as it allows easy access to the <br />lake. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone noted that this project was completed approximately $400 below the <br />contract price which seemed atypical. Mr. Brown stated that the Contractor had aimed for <br />meeting the contract budget. In this case, there was not a lot of uncertainty in the job as it <br />primarily involved large, lump-sum items. On items that could exceed budget, they were <br />estimated conservatively. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to approve Pay Estimate #3 for Jay Brothers, Inc. of Forest Lake, <br />Minnesota in the amount of $7,507.34. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked if a guardrail would be installed between the control panel <br />stainless steal casing and the road. Mr. Stafford stated that he did not recall this being part of the <br />contract. Councilmember Larson asked if there was a future plan for a guardrail in this location. <br />Mr. Stafford stated that there is a plan to pour a walk to the roadway, but no plan for a guardrail. _ <br />Mr. Brown stated that he was comfortable with the separation in this area and it does meet the ... <br />clearance criteria for a County road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.