Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,r <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS EDA - MARCH 8. 1999 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />subject to non-substantial changes being approved by the City Attorney and City <br />AdrninistratorlEDA Secretary; and authorize the President and Secretary to execute all necessary <br />documenlation; subject to conditions.President Probst confirmed that the property owner has <br />until Wednesday, March 10, 1999 to sell the black dirt on the property, or find other means to <br />dispose of it. Assuming the sale closes on March 10, 1999, there would be 30 days for the City <br />to negotiate an agreement on the cost of the dirt. If the agreement is not made within the 30 <br />days, the agreement would go to arbilration and both parties would be allowed to present their <br />cases. Mr. Ringwald stated that lhis was correct. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson expressed his concern that the property owner would have no incentive to <br />negotiate the cost of the dirt prior to the 30 days. The property owner may decide to wait until <br />arbitration as this could result in the proposed costs being split down the middle and the City <br />could end up paying substantially more than the estimated cost. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald stated that this would be no different than the process used in a condemnation. <br />The two parties would have the same arguments and the Judge would most likely make the same <br />decision to split the cost down the middle. The City can try for the lowest price possible, <br />however, in the end, the result traditionally is to take the two appraisals and divide them by two, <br />assuming the fair market value is somewhere in between. Mr. Ringwald stated that this is not <br />necessarily the fairest method for the taxpayer, however, the entire process is not necessarily fair <br />e to the property owner either. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked how much dirt the Staff is estimating is on the land. Mr. Ringwald <br />slated that the Staffis estimating between 25,000 to 30,000 cubic yards. Commissioner Larson <br />pointed oul that, at $2.00 per cubic yard, this would amount to approximately $60,000, as <br />opposed to the $210,000 proposed by the property owner. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald agreed and noted lhal Staff had decided to first focus on the quantity of dirt, Ihen <br />attempt to determine a price. The quantity of dirt will hopefully be an easy issue to resolve as it <br />is a finite piece of information. <br /> <br />President Probst concurred that an agreement will be made regarding the quantity of dirt as the <br />property owner can nol argue with the facts of the survey. With regard to the value of the dirt, <br />presumably the Staff has done its homework to determine the market value. He noted that the <br />price presented by Mr. Indykiewicz is a delivered price and includes costs that do not apply in <br />this case. <br /> <br />President Probst noted that, if the EDA approves the purchase agreement, the City is committing <br />itselfto accepting any decision made if the agreement goes to arbitration. Mr. Ringwald slated <br />this is correct for both the City and the property owners. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if it had been lhe property owner who had sought the provision to <br />retain the ability to sell the dirt prior to closing. Mr. Ringwald stated that it had been a combined <br />agreement between the City and the property owner. The City would prefer for the property <br />owner to sell or dispose of the dirt and remove this issue from the purchase agreement. Mr. <br />Fritsinger noted that this discussion had taken place several weeks ago and, at this time, no dirt <br />